Search results

Self-righteousness isn't one of the fruit of the Holy Spirit.

I find it hilarious (and, sadly, consistent) that the OP's choice is one option that doesn't answer the question at all.

You completely missed the point.

Okay, I’m done with you. I see no reason to entertain your foolishness.

Right, and Eratosthenes didn’t even exist, but is also a figment of our fertile imaginations. Your denial of simple science is profound.

Wow. Dude, I have not encountered someone so unwilling to read in a long time. Shall I explain in monosyllables, or would you like to try again?

Instead of being so focused on your question that you come across as foolish, read your post to which I responded, then read my response.

Most people badly misinterpret that verse. It says, ‘The origin of the prophetic passages recorded in Scripture is not human imagination or analysis of current events.’

If I understood what you wrote, I might have seen that there was a question to answer. Maybe you should reread my post?

With respect, your verbiage is convoluted such that it is difficult to understand you. Grammar and brevity are your friends.

No, but as long as he is somewhat respectful, I will try to be as well.

I'm aware of the dangers. I'm also aware that the fruit of the Holy Spirit does not show up fully formed when it might be convenient.

Since the first picture is not what I see, your "proof" is irrelevant.

You can get your knickers in a twist all you like, but the evidence is there for all to see. I offered you an out, and you have replied with indignation. That reflects poorly on you.

That's a fallacious argument. Just because NASA has been found to be dishonest (and I don't accept that claim either, but I'll run with it), does not prove that any other agency is dishonest. Further, you cannot simply broadbrush "their ilk" and conveniently include any person or agency within...

You are making the claim, "Everyone observes a flat earth." According to your own words, the burden of proof is on you to support your claim... So, prove it.

Right here, post 101: I believe you have said that English is not your first language, so you may not grasp the nuances of grammar. As you wrote it, you referred to the Holy Spirit as "it".

I understand, though I disagree. If the relationship is perceived to be toxic (or the person simply wants more of your attention than you want to give them), it is appropriate to set a boundary... respectfully. How the person handles the boundary is their issue, not yours. Exactly. I would...

First thought: What’s a Christmas card? Second thought: Why expend energy trying to maintain a relationship with someone who doesn’t want a relationship with you? Third thought: Treat others as you would want them to treat you.