Search results

Family planning is between them and the Lord, not something to be imposed from outside, and it has nothing to do with the OP. ;)

It’s not an assumption at all, but a conclusion drawn directly from Scripture. Christians are not under the Law, period. We are under the covenant in Christ’s blood.

Please show the Scripture where ‘tithing’ is discussed within the context of the new covenant.

The ‘heart of flesh’ is contrasted with a heart of stone and was spoken prophetically with regard to Israel and the (then) future coming of the Holy Spirit. It has nothing to do (directly) with the physical marital relationship.

Streeeetch.

Jesus calls 'satan' "the prince of the power of the air" and 'satan' is later called "the prince of this world" several times. Why then do you doubt that 'satan' has the power to control the weather?

You might find it incredible, but those more familiar with the text of Scripture wouldn't... Ephesians 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: (KJV)...

The word "imply" is not used to express doubt, but rather that an idea is not clearly stated but is a reasonable conclusion from what is clearly stated. When I "imply" something, I hope or expect my hearers (or readers) to "read between the lines". I often use implication but it is more...

Job 1:6 (NIV) One day the angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them. I stated that 'satan' came. I didn't "suggest" or "say" anything different. Kindly don't put words in my mouth. That little word "also" tells you that 'satan' was not included among the...

The term is "OP" (original post), not "opp" which is usually short for "opportunity". I am not obligated to answer your question. If I do so, it is my choice only. No, what I am saying is that 'satan' came before the Lord, which is exactly what the Scripture says. I don't need to add anything...

The Scripture says the accuser came; it says nothing about him being invited. You're using the wrong word, and by doing so, injecting a mess of confusion into the passage. Again, that is not what the Scripture says. It says that one of Job's servants said "The fire of God fell from heaven..."...

You misspelled “discernment”. I corrected you, putting in the missing ‘c’ and ‘n’ which make ‘cern’ in the middle of the word. Aaron56 just made the link to CERN, the controversial research facility.

Yes, ‘satan’ was in the heavenly court. No, he was never ‘invited’. It’s simply the wrong word. Yes, ‘satan’ was granted power over Job’s health, family, and goods. The power was always limited by God Himself. This is right in the text of Job 1 and 2: “The Lord said to Satan, “Very well, then...

Confusion is what results when you put together two unrelated verses of Scripture and imply that they say the same thing.

Perhaps some context would help. Satan was never “invited to heaven” in Scripture, nor was he ever “granted every power God had… to use at his disposal”. It sounds like you’re talking about the early chapters of Job; perhaps you could confirm.

Respectfully, you are confusing tithing with giving. Tithing is the mandatory submission of a tenth of one’s increase in goods to support the Levites, priests, and the poor. It is not required of Christians. Giving, which is strongly encouraged of Christians, is voluntary both in kind and in...

Psst… disCerNment…

Shhh… don’t ask the questions that debunk FE theory… you’ll bring the entertainment to an end. ;)

So how does the Lord tell His people that a particular danger is pending, as He did through Agabus?

Again, they don't think they are doing so. They are denying what they think is incorrect doctrine.