Search results

I do not see the Holy Spirit leaving those who were faithful to God and His instructions in OT times.

Did I ever gainsay this? Are we splitting hairs? The principle has been the same all along: by grace through faith. Even in the days when circumcision was obligatory for gentiles who converted. Now, the change is in the element of the means of the outward sign of the covenant; water baptism...

And what was implied with becoming a jew then? Salvation by works? The main issue here is that you hold to that there are different gospels between the "dispensations"; is it not? Not exactly sure whether this actually fit into the replacement theology thread.

No. Haven't changed my mind. To me being a jew in OT times does not mean equal to rabbinic judaism. Mind to tell what you are shooting at?

"The world began in Eden and ended in Los Angeles" (Phil Ochs).

I believe that works were never a "requirement" for justification. As for justification no works on man's part are needed. Same then as now. However works of faith follows as a fruit of justification.

Sort of. It's the same principle. Foreseeing as well as retrospective. Old Testament believers were also saved by grace through faith, by the grace of God whom they trusted according to His own promises.

Since emotions rather than arguments from scripture have come up again, let us at least then be fair and see what some jewish sources say about Jesus, christians and gentiles (so we don't get it all wrong thinking it's a one sided-issue, with only one side hating and the other being victims of...

I am happy to see that you still adhere to the biblical teaching of one single gospel through all times and seasons, whether in OT or NT. Noone are to be sidetracked by splittings of hairs.

May we have that Luther quote again? Ty.

Ya, I'll wait for a new and working version of that installer/app. Just take your time, folks.

Dare to think let alone mention who is the elephant behind the leftist and BLM?

Not sure what you mean by "all I need to know". Maybe it would have made sense if you had only quoted 1Cor.2:2, but you also quoted man's so-called wisdom by saying: Notice that Paul when stated what he did in 1Cor.2:2, he was regenerate. Should ring a bell.

Quoting a scripture when caught in error, old trick that never works. No one old natural man wants to know Jesus and Him crucified. Hopefully you get a desire to know your free-will folly error and stand corrected of same.

Aloo chole, my lunch yesterday. I did spice it up with taco powder to enhance the tomato flavor.

The more you repeat your error it does not make it right. I hope you are able to choose to be corrected by scripture. :)

Yes, I agree that such might be harmful. But that problem lies with those who wrongly think so, not the ones who believe in healing yet it was not yet to be seen. Just like Job's friends insinuated that the afflictions he suffered was due to problems with his uprightness. Job's friends were in...

I don't see what would be wrong, if anything, in asking God for and receive physical healing. If by preaching "prosperity" means getting filthy rich or even rich from gospel preaching, then, yes, that would be wrong. But if "prosperity" just means having your basic needs met for health and...

Yep. The law actually points to the gospel. All along.

For them, yes. But NOT for their offspring. Not the same today. Try read Romans 5:12-14. No, not as for the old man. Like I already showed you it's not a choice matter on our part initially. We are. as passive recipients of an undeserved pardon, just to be grateful to God that He intervened and...