Yes it is.. and this is the historical background of the letter to Corinth. It's supporting the Word. That's just reading context.
Place, time, reason for writing etc.. can be gleaned from historical context.
Here is the thing..
1) The Corinth area was affected by paganism
2) That paganism included their own kind of tongue speaking
3) Paul did not mention exactly this kind.. but did admonish the Corinthians, through the Holy Spirit, to use tongue speaking with order and decency and for it to be clearly understood.
4) The Corinth church had other problems associated with paganism
So it would make sense that pagan tongue speaking was an issue for the church at Corinth.
I'll leave talking about the history here.. but it is important.. especially for the church at Corinth because it is a complex situation they were in.
Place, time, reason for writing etc.. can be gleaned from historical context.
Here is the thing..
1) The Corinth area was affected by paganism
2) That paganism included their own kind of tongue speaking
3) Paul did not mention exactly this kind.. but did admonish the Corinthians, through the Holy Spirit, to use tongue speaking with order and decency and for it to be clearly understood.
4) The Corinth church had other problems associated with paganism
So it would make sense that pagan tongue speaking was an issue for the church at Corinth.
I'll leave talking about the history here.. but it is important.. especially for the church at Corinth because it is a complex situation they were in.
So while, yes, a pagan practice, it does not mean is was from the devil, it is something that people can observe and mimic.
-
1
- Show all