I understand the Greek which outranks your personal beliefs.You obviously do not understand what Hermeneutics is about or any of its sound, rock-solid interpretative principles. God did not choose Christ; He chose his elect.
I understand the Greek which outranks your personal beliefs.You obviously do not understand what Hermeneutics is about or any of its sound, rock-solid interpretative principles. God did not choose Christ; He chose his elect.
John and Revelation used different versions for world.But it doesn't mean EVERY individual from every nation in the world. Rev 5 and 7 affirm that "world" is used in the limited sense of all men w/o distinction. And this also proves there is no partiality with God!
Once again the Greek is plain and easy to understand.You're truly desperate, aren't you? You need to take courses in Hermeneutics! And besides the "us" is clearly identified: The saints in Ephesus (Eph 1:2) to whom Paul was writing and, therefore, by extension all New Covenant believers.
Yeah, like Adam....not all died because of his trespass. ( it was just for the "many.")You miss the point. Many people here say Jesus paid for the sins of all mankind. I offered 3 verses...Matthew 20:28, Matthew 26:28, Hebrews 9:28...all of which categorically state this isn't the case.
4 He chose us in the Messiah before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless before Him in love.
5 He predestined us for adoption as sons through Messiah Yeshua
Agree, what they really object to is the pseudo philosophy stripped of its window dressing and facade to make it sound biblical, I notice it is very triggering.
Triggered because.... They get beat over the head by a demon if they can not maintain the illusion.
Predestination does not go against God's character. If He offers salvation to those he knew would reject it, then it was done to serve as a stumbling block or snare, to give them no excuse. His word always goes out to save some and at the same time condemn others. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was sent.No shotgun weddings allowed in heaven. And no forcible signing of covenants either.
Otherwise Satans accusations are legit.
Predestination does not go against God's character. If He offers salvation to those he knew would reject it, then it was done to serve as a stumbling block or snare, to give them no excuse. His word always goes out to save some and at the same time condemn others. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was sent.
That is interesting, not a good place.
Same with transgenders that get easily triggered.
Be reasonable and rational with them?
They MUST maintain their delusion or suffer in the hands of their slave master.
Oh, like the hugely popular Augustinian view of hell to which you likely subscribe?Another thing I really find interesting (not really), is how believers are held to a higher moral standard of conduct than the god of Canons of Dort.
Oh, like the hugely popular Augustinian view of hell to which you likely subscribe?
"He always offers salvation in every area of the bible even to those he knew would reject it so what is the point of him doing that?"See I am a bit on the fence here because while yes I do believe that he died for all not some I also cannot say that we have free will either because the scriptures clearly show otherwise but if free will was taken out of the picture what do we have left?
We have election and predestination and in order to make sense of that one would have to assume that some are predestined to be saved but others not however this goes against his character and he always offers salvation in every area of the bible even to those he knew would reject it so what is the point of him doing that?
Well the only logical reason would be because he does give a little wiggle room for free will or the ability to choose at the very least but then one also has to be drawn to him in order for this to happen.
So how does one have free will and be saved vs not having free will and being saved? This just seems to further complicate the issue
Wrong. The offer is ALWAYS legitimate.Predestination does not go against God's character. If He offers salvation to those he knew would reject it, then it was done to serve as a stumbling block or snare, to give them no excuse. His word always goes out to save some and at the same time condemn others. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was sent.
concerning katallássō ... yes, you are in unbelief.So I'm in unbelief?
I did not say that ... and, no, my statement was not intended to infer you were an unbeliever.Cameron143 said:I'm an unbeliever?
1 Corinthians 15:22... all died in Adam. All being the entirety of mankind.Yeah, like Adam....not all died because of his trespass. ( it was just for the "many.")
Romans 5:15
But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God’s grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
As this thread is over 300 pages long, I haven't read through every post again, but I cannot remember any Calvinist claiming that you have to be a Calvinist to be saved, or that non-Calvinists are not saved. If they are doing so, or if the same thing happens the other way round, that cannot be right.Take note that there are Calvinists on this tread that have leveled the accusation that the FW crowd are unsaved ("don't know God" "blasphemers" etc etc). And they bash US constantly too!