5 Points of Arminianism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
You know very well that I have never had that kind of reply to you. In fact, if you research my posts, I have stated that I think you have the promise of eternal inheritance, as most on this form do. It seems you are trying to be a little vindictive.
Sweet talking me now? Ain't that be something?
Might make a person think they're being deceived.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Your statement is based upon Rom 1, which is wrongly misinterpreted by the "salvation by works people". If you consider the whole context of Romans 1, Paul tells you who is under consideration in Rom 1:6, Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ.

Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them, for God hath shewed it unto them. Because that when they knew God, they glorified him not, as God, neither were thankful. (Rom 1:18-21).

If you do not understand these scriptures as pertaining to backsliding born again children of God, then you are not humble enough to understand how terrible you are by your fleshly nature.
Those people Paul spoke about are being JUDGED and Condemned by God because there's enough physical evidence from His Creation, including HIS additions after the Flood that every human being sinner can see God exists.

This is knowledge to every human being on Earth.

A person cannot claim to be Atheist unless there is Someone to deny.

They have this evidence before them and God speaks to them but they deny Him. They have REASONED God in a literal realm of reality cannot possibly exist.

They have Rejected the WORKS finished upon the Cross. Because they deny what they are looking at like the Grand Canyon, a true mountain range, even the old parts of Israel that existed before and after Yeshua walked them. All over the Globe there's Natural Amazement and Wonder that the whole beautiful picture represents God's Artwork.

And these people have checked it out and REASONED it was by accident and theories.

They could have chosen to Believe in God but decided to listen to themselves and the Deceiver they have no idea is there haunting them.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,091
113
respectfully, The everyone in your version is "all" in the KJV, and the all are all Israel in verse 26.
Just as you who formerly disobeyed God have now received mercy through their disobedience, so they
too have now disobeyed, in order that they too may now receive mercy through the mercy shown to you.
For God has consigned everyone to disobedience so that He may have mercy on everyone.


This is Paul in Romans, comparing Gentile (you) to Jew. All means all. Everyone, is Every. Single. One. Respectfully.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,658
8,202
113
You preach your false doctrine to whomever you want, but the natural man, that has not been born again with the new spiritual life, will not hear you, and will think your doctrine is foolishness.
Nope. No preaching or doctrine and that post. You've got that all wrong......:cautious:
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,658
8,202
113
Just as you who formerly disobeyed God have now received mercy through their disobedience, so they
too have now disobeyed, in order that they too may now receive mercy through the mercy shown to you.
For God has consigned everyone to disobedience so that He may have mercy on everyone.
100% sister.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,562
9,080
113
Not many people know that Arminians have a flower too. Yeah, but it’s not a Tulip.

It’s a Daisy.

They go through life pulling a petal believing They lose Salvation and God’s love, and then pull another! And Wallah! They get it and Him back! Just have to hope that last one is the right one!
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
But no one, not a single poster, nada believes God is not keeping His promises.

No one is saying God will renig on your Salvation after He gave it to you freely.

But to be in the Shadows of the Almighty, one must remain there by choice.
 

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
I’m laughing because two or three years ago you didn’t know what an Arminian was, yet you vehemently denied being one. Now it seems you’re starting to realize that you are one.
I reckon that’s a step I the right direction.

Now if we can just get you to see that Arminianism/Pelagianism is in fact a works gospel that deceives the masses and causes churches to apostatize.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,091
113
I’m laughing because two or three years ago you didn’t know what an Arminian was, yet you vehemently denied being one. Now it seems you’re starting to realize that you are one.
I reckon that’s a step I the right direction.

Now if we can just get you to see that Arminianism/Pelagianism is in fact a works gospel that deceives the masses and causes churches to apostatize.
Two or three years ago I most certainly did know what Arminianism is, what Calvinism is, and what Molinism is. Either
your memory is faulty, you confuse me with someone else, or you deliberately lie. I would not put the last past you.
 

Snacks

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2022
1,410
771
113
I’m laughing because two or three years ago you didn’t know what an Arminian was, yet you vehemently denied being one. Now it seems you’re starting to realize that you are one.
Actually, @Magenta is Christian.
 

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
Two or three years ago I most certainly did know what Arminianism is, what Calvinism is, and what Molinism is. Either
your memory is faulty, you confuse me with someone else, or you deliberately lie. I would not put the last past you.
Calling me a liar, that’s nice. I notice you picked just one part of my post to mount your attack. You didn’t address my past denial claim or your current position on Arminianism. How convenient.

Try to focus now.

Looking at your recent posts defending Arminianism and knowing your history of promoting man’s ability to believe unto salvation of his own choice, we’ll take a “leap” and say you are in fact an Arminian.

Are you Arminian?

1. Deny you’re Arminian now and you’ll prove your doctrinal ignorance and or YOUR dishonesty.

2. Admit you’re Arminian now and you’ll prove my previous post true because of your past denial and or YOUR dishonesty.

Painted yourself into a corner there.

I know your skull gears are smoking right now, take a breath. As I said before, it seems you’re starting to realize that you’re Arminian. It’s ok, that’s a step in the right direction.

Now if we can just get you to see that Arminianism/Pelagianism is in fact a works gospel that deceives the masses and causes churches to apostatize.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,091
113
Calling me a liar, that’s nice. I notice you picked just one part of my post to mount your attack. You didn’t address my past denial claim or your current position on Arminianism. How convenient.
Just over 2 years ago, you admitted you knew little of Arminianism. And here:

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-stirring-the-pot.180696/page-84#post-4317047

I tell you I disagree with free will, but you ignore that and claim I am among those who promote it.

Why does Pelagianism come into this? I am not one of them either. Your understanding of what I believe looks
to amount to zero, yet you feel qualified to make declarative statements about what I believe none-the-less.


I am not here to answer to your demands. From what I have seen, you are a game player, and dishonesty goes with that.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Now if we can just get you to see that Arminianism/Pelagianism is in fact a works gospel that deceives the masses and causes churches to apostatize.
You have brought into a history of Wesley to Pentecost even if they only connect because of a simple factor in each separate origin.

But you clearly have never attended any such Church because none of what YOU CLAIM THEY BELIEVE do they actually believe.

NO Pentecost believes you can work for your Salvation.

Or, you can lose it because God decides to make you lose it.

What they do believe is where both Calvin and Armini also believed at.

Mostly what they don't believe has nothing to do with Calvin or Armini.

You posted a biased Source that represents Southern Baptist beliefs and who disagrees with them.

I know, I was born into a Southern Baptist home church.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,091
113
Looking at your recent posts defending Arminianism
Properly defining something does not amount to defending what it is.

I have done the same with Calvinism. Will you call me a Calvinist because of it?

I have done the same with Molinism. Will you call me a Molinist because of it?

You have a penchant for name calling and a dearth of understanding.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,091
113


He started out black and white... Inspired by the discussions around whether man's will is free or not .;)

I have been here for over seven years and in that time probably not once ever agreed with man having free will,
having many times said that man's will is constrained by too many factors to be truly considered free. Sampling:


The choice thing seems to be the stickler. Do we have free will? Of course not, at least, I disagree with that
whole concept, since our will is constrained by many factors; I prefer instead the term self will. Man's will
is clearly bent one way or the other, as plainly shown throughout the whole of Scripture. To say one makes
a choice aligns with the fact that we are not forced, and does not deny that it is God Who makes it possible :)
You may know I disagree with the free will verbiage... since our will is constrained in many ways, by factors
too plenteous to enumerate, some of which are unknown to us. However, God's will and self will are plainly
laid out throughout the whole of Scripture. The point concerning choice is whether we choose to align with
God's will, or choose to oppose God's will. Adam clearly chose to oppose God's will, and God not only allowed
Adam and Eve to make that choice, He had made provision for it from before the foundation of the world.
How any Christian could argue against that is perplexing.
https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-stirring-the-pot.180696/page-84#post-4317047
I prefer the term "self will" over "free will." Man's will is constrained by too many factors to really call it "free." On the other hand, self will is clearly a Biblical principle, especially in regards to whether it is aligned with God's will, or not... which is rather the point, isn't it?


https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...stirring-the-pot.180696/page-117#post-4323809
I prefer the term self will, since man's will is constrained by many factors... :)


Man's will is either aligned with God's, or it is not.

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...study-in-election.194413/page-55#post-4366705
I do not subscribe to "free will," for man's will is constrained by many factors :)


Self will, however, is an entirely different matter ;)

As can be seen throughout Scripture, from Genesis onward :geek:

I tend to think of God's will as being evident in three ways:

His sovereign will: Our God is in heaven; He does as He pleases. (Psalm 115:3)

His moral will (as seen in His character and the ten commandments).

His permissive will (allowing man to rebel against Him).
Not outside God's permissive will. He could exert His sovereign will and force people to choose Him, but He does not.
Man's will is constrained by many factors. "Free will" is a misnomer.
The will is constrained by many factors, so calling it free is really a misnomer.
On the other hand, the results of humanity placing self will above the
will of God are clearly laid out in Scriptures, from beginning to end.


It is not so very difficult at all to see the depravity of man's will when in opposition to God.

Secularists would call it human nature, which equates to what the Bible identifies it as the natural man.
Doing it your way is exactly what self will is. Now, calling free will a misnomer does not mean people do not have a choice ;) It is just that there are many things we do not get to have a choice about at all, because our will is constrained by many factors, and also the fact that the most important choice we make in this life is in choosing God's will over our own.
Free will is a bit (understatement) of a misnomer, since the will of man is constrained by many factors.
I prefer the term "self will." Many will argue against this LOL.

Yet self will is seen from beginning to end in Scripture.

One's will is either aligned with God's, or not.

Adam and Eve sinned in placing their will above God's. All else do likewise, since we are born
enemies and rebellious toward Him. Jesus said those who sin are slaves of sin. Slaves are not free.


Jesus alone sets us free from this predicament. He overcame sin and death.
I prefer the the self will, since it is evident from the beginning to the end of Scripture.
Plus, you allude to the same thing I have said often: the will is constrained by many factors :)
I prefer the term "self will" over "free will," since the will of man is constrained by many factors.
Free will is a misnomer, since the will is constrained by many factors.
Self will on the other hand, is apparent from front to back of the Bible.
Man's will is either aligned with God's, or it is not.
Man's will being constrained does not mean he is not morally responsible for choices he makes.
I prefer the term "self will" since man's will is constrained by many factors.
However, we are asked/exhorted to choose to believe and have faith.

If man has no choice in the matter, why would God punish those who do not choose to believe in Him?
I prefer the term self will :)
Partially (and largely) because man's will is constrained by many factors.

So many, in fact, that it can hardly be called free.
Free will (in terms of how people generally use the term) is not mentioned in the Bible.
Personally, I do not care for the term, since man's will is constrained by many factors.
Man's will is constrained by many factors, and as such, I prefer the term "self will" :)
Man's will in opposition to God is the problem.

Thank God He gives us new desires! :D
Perhaps @NOV25 will finally get it. Hope springs eternal .:D
 

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
4,699
2,002
113
Your testimony is, “I, I, I” it should be He, He, He. That’s the difference between Arminians and Calvinists.

No, that's just simply a lie. So either you're just regurgitating what someone else you listen to is saying, or you are deliberately lying. I'm hoping you just simply don't know any better.
 

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
Just over 2 years ago, you admitted you knew little of Arminianism. And here:

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-stirring-the-pot.180696/page-84#post-4317047

I tell you I disagree with free will, but you ignore that and claim I am among those who promote it.

Why does Pelagianism come into this? I am not one of them either. Your understanding of what I believe looks
to amount to zero, yet you feel qualified to make declarative statements about what I believe none-the-less.


I am not here to answer to your demands. From what I have seen, you are a game player, and dishonesty goes with that.
Just over 2 years ago, you admitted you knew little of Arminianism. And here:

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-stirring-the-pot.180696/page-84#post-4317047

I tell you I disagree with free will, but you ignore that and claim I am among those who promote it.

Why does Pelagianism come into this? I am not one of them either. Your understanding of what I believe looks
to amount to zero, yet you feel qualified to make declarative statements about what I believe none-the-less.


I am not here to answer to your demands. From what I have seen, you are a game player, and dishonesty goes with that.
You're not Pelagian either? Are you saying you’re not Pelagian or Arminian?

Why then were you the first to respond to this thread with your FACTS and continually defend the doctrine?

Oh I see
You have brought into a history of Wesley to Pentecost even if they only connect because of a simple factor in each separate origin.

But you clearly have never attended any such Church because none of what YOU CLAIM THEY BELIEVE do they actually believe.

NO Pentecost believes you can work for your Salvation.

Or, you can lose it because God decides to make you lose it.

What they do believe is where both Calvin and Armini also believed at.

Mostly what they don't believe has nothing to do with Calvin or Armini.

You posted a biased Source that represents Southern Baptist beliefs and who disagrees with them.

I know, I was born into a Southern Baptist home church.
Little trouble following you there.

But yes it’s my conclusion that Arminianism/Pelagianism (aka man’s ability to believe unto salvation) is a root of apostasy. And yes, I gave the Catholic, Methodist, Pentecostal/Charismatic churches as examples.

All of these either started in or adopted the works gospel then went astray in some way. There are more but researching these should reveal the obvious common denominator.

To put it bluntly, look up any church that affirms gay marriage, prosperity gospel, woman preachers, gay pastors etc. and you’ll discover their Arminian/Pelagian stance. Why?

Because easy believism breeds false converts who eventually hold positions of authority in the church, which causes further spiral into heresy.

It’s not rocket science.