Search results

Your assumptions demonstrate the sickness of your heart.

I reject macro evolution because I understand logic and science, and am not swayed by unscientific assertions masquerading as science. It’s a pity that offends you.

Bahahaha… cult? No. I do my homework. I pray you will come to understand the truth.

Something that is objectively false, such as macroevolution, cannot be proven to be objectively true. ;)

Your options: 1. God has preserved His completed word for us today in a book. 2. God has not preserved His completed word for us today in a book. One of many other options: God has preserved His word in many written works. That one options shoots apart your argument.

Wrong. Read the dictionary.

I don’t see “apostasy” mentioned in Jude. Which version are you using?

Clearly, you haven’t been reading posts by ‘JustbyFaith’.

Fallacy; false dichotomy. These are not the only options available. Read whatever you like; just don’t imply that it’s wrong for others to read whatever they like.

Fallacy: equivocation. If "evolution = change with respect to time", it is acceptable and true. If "evolution = goo to you through the zoo" then it is unquestionably false. I am not harming your faith by telling you that you are wrong; it is your own fault for believing something that is not...

Yada yada yada. Most of what you discuss in this thread is NOT apostasy, but simply unbelief. By confusing the two, you have made a concern out of thin air. Unsaved people have always and will always make a mockery of true faith. Why should anyone be concerned with how they celebrate? Is it...

There is a third option: he has chosen his ignorance willingly.

That isn't what he is accusing you of doing. If you think it is, you're even less intelligent than I thought.

It’s plainly evident that you don’t know what the word “apostasy” means. Try using a dictionary.

Since the biblical canon was completed several centuries before Islam developed, it contains no references to Islam, halal, or any associated terms. Do your homework and find out the standards and procedures in which halal meats are prepared. That’s where the concern is.

Save your insults for someone who is impressed by them. I'm not, and the Lord certainly isn't.

Fallacy: circular reasoning.

Fallacy: non sequitur. Contemporary (first-century) Greek usage is relevant; modern Greek usage is not.

No, it’s a made-up term that means nothing and is used only to denigrate other believers.

I notice that he never articulates what else was happening in his life. I suspect that his "anemia" has nothing whatsoever to do with the version he was reading. It's the fallacy of non-causal correlation.