Search results

If you only use one translation, and are under the delusion that translation is perfect, you will be limited in your ability to interpret Scripture. I'm not accusing you of this, though there are others on this board who do fit that description. I examined Psalm 12 closely here: Psalm 12 under...

You're drawing unwarranted conclusions again. Nothing in the Acts 17 passage suggests "that is the way the Holy Spirit teaches". Rather, the Bereans were commended because they searched the scriptures to see if Paul's words were consistent with them. Jesus said in John 16:13 "When the Spirit...

It's good that you aren't blind to its errors as some adherents are.

Yet the KJV is not correct, regardless of its source. The context makes elohim singular in this case, and it should have been translated as "a god" or "a spirit" as it is rendered in modern English translations. No, as I'm not claiming that. I have no obligation to support a point I have not...

No, we can't. We can, however, compare the KJV to the texts from which it was translated, and in this case, it is wrong. Your position is wrong. There isn't even a shred of logic in your argument. Misrepresenting my position and decrying it is called a strawman fallacy. It's just a pathetic...

No, He doesn't, and that's not Peter's point at all. The Jews were offended at a "weak" Christ Who was crucified instead of being a conquering king. They chose not to believe in the Messiah when He came to them. This is a sick and disgusting attempt to slander people who disagree with your...

Your bolded sentence, while technically correct, highlights an error in the KJV. As recorded in 1 Samuel 28, Saul sought out the witch of Endor. She complied with his request and saw something... (v. 13-14): "And the king said unto her, Be not afraid: for what sawest thou? And the woman said...

Redefining a commonly-understood term to something that happens to suit your argument is nothing short of fraudulent. The TR and the Masoretic text ARE NOT the original text. They are copies of copies. While the text they present may be consistent with the original text, it is highly unlikely...

Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I don't think John146 was using "mythical" in the same sense described here. While the 72 translators is undoubtedly a made-up story (as ten of the tribes were already dispersed well before the 2nd century BC), it is verifiable that a Greek version of the OT...

Where is that in Scripture? It isn't. Rather, it is something you treat as Scripture to justify your view of guidance and of the KJV. In truth, the Holy Spirit can guide you with words that don't appear in Scripture at all, as He has done for me many times. He doesn't even speak in Elizabethan...

For that, I recommend that you read chapter 5 of James White's Scripture Alone.

You call the Septuagint "mythical" yet clearly you have not done the study yourself. Only someone who holds an a priori view about the Septuagint (or, in this case, about the KJV) is going to come up with such a ridiculous idea.

No, that's not what I think. I disagree completely. They were Isaiah's own words about himself. No. Just... No. As I stated, you cannot make an exhaustive case on the basis of a few examples, when there are counter-examples as I have given. It is beyond ridiculous to claim that God gave...

Perhaps if you take the time to study logical fallacies, you will see them in your own arguments. I can't convince you of that which you refuse to learn. Just because some verses, or even many verses, are the literal words of God, it does not mean that every verse is the literal words of God...

This is an elementary matter: Paul is the author, and Tertius is the penman. Only fools and those with a foolish agenda would attempt to argue anything else.

I guess you are woefully ignorant of the fact that, in Canada, people travel primarily by car. Please, go and spread your ignorance somewhere else. Leave this site for people who know what they're talking about.

The problem is that you are presenting an erroneous interpretation of Scriptures cited. While you may not be here to argue, you also don’t get a free pass to promote error. You already stated that you won’t read material outside Scripture, which means you have truncated your education and are...

Ask a Canadian about Canada instead of relying on conspiracy websites. The above is not true. Besides, we don’t have “states”; we have “provinces”.

Further down in your post, you claim that there is no scriptural evidence to support the idea that Psalm 51 was David's words that God accepted. In the same way, there is no scriptural evidence that every word of the account of creation came from the mouth of God at the moment it was given to...

Agreed, on this one point. And we are given many examples of the words of men recorded in Scripture. You are cherry-picking verses and not considering the whole counsel of Scripture. David had in mind to build a temple for the Lord; Nathan told him, "Whatever you have in mind, go ahead and do...