Search results

"Refuse to stay on topic"? Who died and made you king? You say yourself that repentance is linked with remission of sins. If you don't want to discuss the issue, that's your decision, but dismissing the discussion with "You have made your choice" is insulting and ridiculous.

Yawn. I wasn't changing the subject; I was responding to JustbyFaith.

You are far too full of yourself with regard to your role here. You don't have the knowledge, or the understanding, or the authority to teach Scripture, unless of course you're content to continue being a false teacher. Facepalm...

Your claims are empty. The Father was still in heaven; He did not take on flesh. If He had, then folks would have seen Him. Yet John stated plainly and clearly, "No one has ever seen God" ("John 1:18). Mark 1:11 shows that a voice from heaven came; meaning that God the Father was in heaven, not...

So you're both wrong in this regard.

Some prophecies are 'done and dusted'. For example, Jesus already came and fulfilled hundreds of specific prophecies. By what criteria would you determine whether some prophesied event will or won't "happen again"?

Kindness is a fruit of the Spirit. We grow in it. Assuming or expecting that Christians have unlimited kindness is setting yourself up for disappointment. You don't have it; why would you expect anyone else does?

I agree with you on this (bolded) statement, which is why I reject dispensationalism with its allegorical treatment of the seven letters in Revelation 2 and 3. They were literal letters to literal congregations, not fantastical prophetic allusions to the future states of the Christian church.

Yup... I'm an equal-opportunity offender. :cool::p:ROFL:

If you have a problem with ten other people, maybe it's time you look at yourself to see if you're at the root of the problem. It works just as well here as it does on the playground.

That's a leading question, which I will happily shred. Firstly, I'm not "suggesting" anything; I'll tell you exactly what I'm saying by saying it. Secondly, both passages are narrative. Luke simply recorded what was said. There is no framework to support the idea that their statements are...

It is not my intention at all to say how horrible you are in any sense; that would be a personal attack, and I have neither intent nor need to attack you. Your ideas, however, are fair game. ;)

Telling the truth and refuting error on any subject is not "bashing", and it certainly isn't sinful. Disagreeing with someone's interpretation of Scripture is not "disrespecting the word of God". It doesn't credit you to use words that you think are correct. Look them up, and avoid looking foolish.

Most of your views are resoundingly UNbiblical. Mark 1:11 refutes your first statement. Acts 1:9 refutes your third statement. John 1:2 refutes your fourth statement. The idea that there is a "Person who exists beside Himself" in not in Scripture... at all, anywhere.

Just give me a straight answer.

That's a good summary of your grasp of Scripture on this subject.

Who appeared to Isaiah in chapter 6?

Yawn. That isn't what Isaiah 57:15 says. There is no "again" there, and it is not implied. Playing with words isn't going to get you any closer to understanding this matter. Wrong again. The passages I quoted refute this idea.

I still disagree (strongly). The prostitute's (usual) primary motivation is not to get the client to harden his heart, but to open his wallet. In the process, his heart is hardened (as is hers). Your exemplary Baptists are actually trying to get others to treat a third party as inferior; there...

I don't agree with the bolded assertion. Perhaps you could explain it more thoroughly.