Search results

I'm not doing your homework for you. You need to read Scripture for yourself to learn the truth of this matter... which certainly isn't either of the options you presented. No, you don't, but demonstrating that you do understand it is appropriate when you are using it as a key part of your...

"Your ilk" is condescending, arrogant, and utterly unconstructive. If you can't focus your comments on statements of the specific person to whom you are responding, either your criticism is too generalized or your emotions are in the way.

Welcome to CC. May the Lord bless you as well.

Bahahahaha! Now that is funny!

Where is that in Scripture?

With respect to you, I don't believe that you have come anywhere close to establishing your case.

I don't agree with your definition, but I can accept that's how you're using the term.

Where else in Scripture? The verses you quoted don't support that assertion.

In what sense are you using "eschatological"? The term simply refers to end-time events, which can legitimately refer to both the end of the age and to the end of the world. Matthew 24 is undoubtedly eschatological, but there is strong debate over whether it refers to the former or the latter...

Your assertion (bolded) is not supported by Scripture. Nothing in verse 48 (or anywhere else) suggests that remission of sins did not occur until verse 48. The Holy Spirit came on the gentiles in verse 44, which strongly suggests that their sins were remitted at that point, and not 'later' upon...

Either withdraw the judgment and we'll continue discussing Scripture, or stick to your folly. I'm not placing any bets.

Bahahaha! Not even a little! There is only one God. Scripture is clear on this matter, so your "second God" idea is absurd. There is nothing whatsoever in Scripture to suggest that God is divisible into fractions, so your '1/3 of God' idea is absurd. Your question is a false dichotomy...

That's an incredibly insipid comment. How about you stick to discussing what Scripture says, and means, and avoid making ignorant judgments about the salvation of others.

It's not reasonable to take a single event (Acts 2), claim that is the "rule", and then say that a different single event is an exception and doesn't need to follow the rule. It's either a rule, or it isn't. I go with the latter.

I'll tell you again that your question is absurd. Not only is it absurd, it's a false dichotomy. You used the term, you define it.

No, that does not follow. God had a specific purpose in sending the messenger to Paul, which Paul himself spells out. Why do you speculate instead of just reading the Scripture and accepting it as fact? They did not know Paul and they were more concerned about being true to Scripture than...

The KJV wording is obtuse. Modern translations make it far more clear that the writer is not telling most Christians to marry, but rather to hold marriage in high esteem. NASB Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for God will judge the sexually...

Agreed. Incorrect. You overlooked the word "Repent". "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." Um, no, they are not "guaranteed" with baptism. Don't read your...

Again, personal preference regarding style of music is irrelevant in this discussion, as are complaints about volume. As for rap, what if the rapper is quoting Scripture verbatim? Is it still wrong? Get your head out of your stubborn tradition.

What a ridiculous question. Using an archaic translation is not helping you understand the issues. What does "manifest" mean in this verse? What do YOU mean by "begotten"? I suspect what you mean, and if I'm correct, you are incorrect.