Search results

Yes... it's unfortunate when people interpret disagreement with their false or erroneous teaching as either anger or demonic malice. I know of three on this forum who frequently do that.

Disagreement is not anger either. ;)

Disagreement over interpretation is NOT synonymous with jealousy. When you disagree with others, you are equally guilty of the "immature" behaviour you decry.

If a person makes inaccurate statements out of ignorance, then the latter is appropriate. If the person makes inaccurate statements knowingly, the former statement is accurate. Only when a person unknowingly makes inaccurate statements AND someone calls them a liar is your assertion valid. Even...

Says the guy who started this debate, and who has demonstrated clearly that he holds grudges. smh...

Here is the text of Luke 1:35 in four different popular translations: ESV And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God. KJV And the angel answered and said...

Just answer the question.

Right here: You still stubbornly refuse to answer my question. It's a simple question. Just answer it.

You're using circular reasoning.

Hi MP2, and welcome to CC... If you haven't read Boundaries by Henry Cloud and John Townsend, I strongly recommend doing so. From what you have shared, it sounds like the only thing that will reach your husband (aside from God Himself), is restriction. Until he can't control you, he will...

All the "qualified KJB translators" died at least 350 years ago. ;) As for the rest, we disagree. Here are the passages where the term appears in relation to Jesus and His relationship to the Father: John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the...

I've heard that 'unique' or 'one-of-a-kind' come closer to the meaning of monogenes than does 'only-begotten'. They are also familiar to modern readers, whereas 'begotten' is really only familiar to folks who read the KJV... and many of them don't have a handle on what it means.

I have been hesitant to comment in this thread, because others have done an admirable job. At this point, you have no business looking for a romantic partner of any ethnicity, because you need to deal with your own c**p first. May the Lord mercifully steer every woman away from you until you...

He's already put me on his Ignore list because he doesn't like what I tell him. I suspect you'll be on the same list soon. The beauty of the Ignore function is that we can still respond to him, so others can see that his ideas are being refuted.

We disagree. I say that repentance is part of the process, because Scripture puts repentance with baptism. I'm not going to bicker back and forth about it.

If you actually did your homework, you would know that the KJV use of "study" does not mean "study" in the modern sense. ;) Unintentionally false teaching is no less false for the lack of intention. Again, if you simply claimed to be discussing, you could not rightly be called a false teacher...

Who appeared to Isaiah, as recorded in Isaiah 6? Before you answer, "God", that's not an adequate response.

As you claim to be teaching, but (at least some of) what you are teaching what is not true, you are a false teacher. If you simply claimed to be discussing, you would not be a false teacher.

Answer the question first.

Which says nothing about the veracity of things you believe and (attempt to) teach.