Search results

I saw the post where you accused him of believing what you stated above. Now you claim he believes that? Do you honestly believe your own rhetoric? Maybe instead of being so argumentative, you need to check your behaviour. Disagreeing with someone, even vigorously, does not justify claiming that...

You put those words in his mouth. You are lying when you say that he claims that.

If you're going to quote and misrepresent Scripture, at least get the quotation accurate. As for your admonition, it's hypocritical, for in accusing me of judging you, you are judging me.

I've addressed you several times, and given you several opportunities to explain your heresy. You have not done so with any degree of biblical soundness, but instead have doubled down, refused at length to answer simple questions, and insisted that you are teaching (which you do so yet again)...

That's an interesting link! I learned something new. Thanks! :)

And the self-delusion deepens...

Absolutely. I'll let you figure out what it is.

Wow. I don't have words to describe adequately your self-delusion.

And he'll continue to whine about it. ;)

I have hesitated to report you for heresy. Because you chose to lash out, I will now take the opportunity to do so.

That's a non sequitur. It does not follow, and therefore your assertion is not sound.

John tells us in 12:41, "Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus’ glory and spoke about him." Isaiah saw Jesus.

I don't "suggest"; I say what I mean.

Another two-second debunking... Once you are suffering from motion sickness, it can take hours for the vestibular system to reset itself. I know that from personal experience, and I also know that the recovery time varies from person to person, so some people recover more quickly.

Really? Where? Are you sure you have read and interpreted any such passage correctly? You do realize that those two assertions cancel each other out, right? Oh. My. Goodness. Come on man, you can't be this dense. People who suffer from motion sickness are moving right along with the earth...

No, a doctrine cannot be at fault for anything. People who promote doctrines are at fault IF the doctrine is incorrect.

Okay, so our eyes are tricking us. That means that you can't trust what your eyes either, which means every explanation that you provide in support of FE is based on unreliable observations as well. Sorry, your theory is self-refuting.

There is no "light backsplash". The sun is visible toward the Southeast in the morning, and toward the Southeast in the evening, from Sydney, Australia. If it were "backsplash", the sun would be visible to the North at those times, while the reflection would also be visible. That is not the case.

It amazes me that people will go to great lengths to defend flat earth and decry a globe earth, but absolutely refuse to deal with a simple question. To wit, if the Earth is flat (and the "North pole" is at the centre of the 'disc'), how can the sun cast a Northward shadow from a point located...

Welcome to CC, Victor! Glad to have you aboard. :)