Search results

Mhmm... a verse with no context or explanation posted in white-on-white displaying your agenda to obfuscate instead of to illuminate.

Mhmm... I know that one too. Please show me the verse(s) demonstrating that an admonishment given to Israelites under the Mosaic covenant is applicable to Christians under the Blood covenant.

Agreed, though the passage doesn't speak to tithing.

Your handle is misleading. I have no need to ‘save face’ because my position is sound. You accuse on the basis of assumptions. Tithing is not a Christian practice; it’s a Levitical requirement. Giving is the Christian thing to do. Being wise with money is also rhe Christian thing to do...

Agreed. There isn't a single verse of Scripture in the entire Bible that suggests, "the Tithe should be used for advancing God's Kingdom". Nor is there a single verse supporting the idea that tithes are payable in money. Further, there isn't a single verse supporting the idea that the...

Now now, there's no need get get all sesquipedalian on us! ;)

If ‘donations’ are for bills, salaries and the poor, what are ‘tithes’ for, in your view, and what verses do you use to support your position?

This is not a problem to be solved, but rather a question to be answered.

You have been asked repeatedly to explain clearly what YOU mean by "the whole Holy Bible", and instead of doing so, you have insulted others, made inappropriate comments about them, and berated them for not knowing information that you refuse to provide. That makes you a troll. In real life I'd...

Just as it's not my fault you're a troll. ;)

Whatever that is. Since you continually refuse to provide a clear, straightforward answer, the default is that the thread is about you.

You're doing nothing of the sort. You're merely a self-important troll with poor grammar.

As he has consistently avoided identifying the version of the Bible he calls ‘the whole holy Bible’, he’s not right about anything.

Prove it. Quote me where I claim to be ‘Pre-Mill’. Or withdraw the accusation. I suspect you don’t have the integrity to do either.

Your argument fails on this: there was a time before the Law. If the Law were eternal, it would have to pre-exist Adam. Hebrews 8:13 says, "By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear." It is clear that the covenant...

Your stubborn unwillingness to answer a simple question demonstrates only two possibilities: either you don't know the answer, or you're truly a jackdonkey. Either way, you're being a troll.

I have made no attempt to answer or imply an answer to the question... nor will I. I'm not going to play the OP's game.

Blah blah blah. Answer the question. Nobody should provide you answers when you refuse to make it clear what you mean.

Quit your ridiculous insulting, yelling, and whining, and step up like a man. State for the record which "Bible" you mean by "the whole Holy Bible". Don't play foolish games. Don't respond with anything other than a plain, direct answer to my inquiry.

Your last sentence reveals your vile attitude.