Search results

You also have to be able to discern between what is meant to be symbolic and what is literal, which you are not doing. When the disciples gathered together, they broke bread and drank wine which is symbolically representing the Lord's body and blood. When I partake of this personally, I break...

Good day Aerials1978! Transubstantiation is the belief that Jesus is called down by the priest into the Eucharist, so that the outer substance of it retains its appearance, but the whole substance of the bread and wine literally becomes the flesh and blood of the Lord Jesus. On the night that...

Why would people not go for it if without the mark they wouldn't be able to pay their debts, buy food, gas, pay mortgages/rent etc.? There is going to be no need for convincing people to receive it, but will be a simple matter of survival. Receive the mark = continue to buy and sell. Reject...

Hello Alertandawake, The reason that people will accept the mark of the beast is already given right in the context, which is that "anyone who doesn't have the mark will not be able to buy or sell." To put it into perspective, anyone who does not have the mark will not be able to electronically...

Greetings and Welcome, sionekkah!

Good day! "And the second beast performed great signs to cause even fire from heaven to come down to earth in the presence of the people." The fire that the false prophet will cause to come down from heaven, I believe will be literal fire. This will be apart of the miracles, signs and wonders...

Hello Alertandawake! How could an Ionospheric Research Instrument have anything to do with the second beast (false prophet) and the mark of the beast? What are you suggesting?

I can see that you are unteachable and that no matter what proof is given to you, you are going to resist it. So, you are free to believe whatever you want. I will not comment on this any more. I've already contended beyond what the Lord would have me.

Don't teach English. The "if" in the verse does not infer does not infer possible falseness of John being that Elijah who was to come. For following that Jesus says, "he is that Elijah who was to come," regardless of whether they excepted it or not. Jesus is stating a fact, not a possibility...

It is amazing how you ignore everything that I listed. You did not give an answer to any of those facts. You state the same thing and never address the information. You have to be smart enough after reading the scripture, taking the context into consideration, which you obviously you are not...

The meaning to Jesus sayin "if you are willing to except it" would be understood as "if you can comprehend it" John the Baptist was that Elijah who was to come. Elijah coming as one of the two witnesses is only conjecture, because no where does it specifically state his name. It is assumed...

That is why you are wrong! Both the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre, is symbolically referring to Satan. Are you so dull that you cannot figure that out? ==================== How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the ground, O...

Journeyman, your error is the translated English word "destroyed." The Greek word doesn't mean annihilation or extinction, but complete loss of well being, ruination, to be completely cut off. 2 Thess.2:8 is describing what is going to happen to the beast when Jesus returns to the earth, which...

Another good point John. When was Nebuchadnezzar an anointed cherub? The answer is, never! The king of Babylon is symbolically referring to Satan.

As I said, the word "hades" is always referring to the place of departed spirits. Did you not read the definition of the word that I provided. Hades was the place where the spirit of the rich man went after the death of his body: "One day the beggar died and was carried by the angels to...

And you think that Nebuchadnezzar was in heaven? It's not talking about him, but about Satan.

Yeah, a man that was in Eden and was in heaven? I don't think so. The king of Babylon is a symbolic name applied to Satan. It is the same for the Prince of Persia who opposed the angel that was sent to Daniel. In fact, Michael the Archangel had to come and help him. You think that the following...

Well, unless Elijah is prophesied to come two times, I would have to say prophecy fulfilled. Remember, it says "before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the LORD." How long is before? So, he did indeed come 'before' the great and dreadful Day of the Lord, which I coming up.

Exactly! The king of Babylon is a symbolic name representing Satan. Just like in Dan.10, the Prince of Persia who kept the angel from getting to Daniel for 21 days, is representing a fallen angel/principality.

Good day Timothy5378! According to Jesus, Elijah has already come: From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been subject to violence, and the violent lay claim to it. For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he...