Search results

What? There is nothing "traditional" about what Jesus commanded at Matthew 28:19. This is just another excuse by you to make void the clear words of Jesus Christ. Secondly, perhaps you can explain to all of us here why at Matthew 28:19 the "Name" is in the singular? You also made this...

Maybe the following article will clear things up a little bit. https://www.watchman.org/articles/jehovahs-witnesses/jehovahs-witnesses-working-out-their-salvation/ :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto

I know it says at Revelation 1:5, "and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the first-born from the dead etc. Jesus Christ is the first-born from the dead who did not die again like Nicodemus for example. Or to put it another way Jesus Christ was the first-born from the dead in a PERMANENT...

Hi revelationman, welcome to the Christian Chat forums. What you posted is on the right track but please take what I'm about to say in the spirit of kindness/correction. First of all the Alpha & Omega and the First & the Last and the Beginning & the End are "NOT" three beings of the Trinity...

Wait a minute buster. You originally made this statement: Trinety has its rots in Babylon. Nimrod the Father(sun god) Semiramis mother (Moon god) and Tammus their child also a god. The Vatican had sold a repackage wersion with father, mother son. Now its repagage again to Father, son, spirit...

Is this not interesting wansvic that here you are saying the following in your very last sentence. "I was obedient to what is seen in the Word because Jesus said that it is the Word everyone will be judged by." Well then, why are you disobeying the Words of Jesus at Matthew 28:19-20? Look what...

Your forgiven! Just take your time and preview what you wrote before you press the reply button. :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto

So wansvic how does Matthew 28:19 fit into the equation? Is it permissible to be water baptized according to this verse? :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto

Really? Then why did the high priest Caiaphas ask Jesus to questions at Matthew 26:63-64? Vs63, "And the high priest said to Him/Jesus, I adjure You by the living God, that You tell us "whether" (1) You are the Christ/Messiah and (2) the Son of God? At Luke 22:70 Jesus responds, "Yes, I am."...

Horse Hockey! Please post your evidence for such garbage and then we will talk. Anyone can make a claim but around here you have to prove your claim. So go for it? Btw, welcome to the Christian Chat forums. :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto

Well let me put it this way. I do not believe Trinitarianism is a REQUIRMENT for salvation. It is the RESULT of salvation. Why? Because you cannot know Jesus Christ and somehow miss the fact that He is God. You cannot have experienced the presense of the Holy Spirit of God and somehow miss that...

Maybe the following will help you since I posted this earlier today. All three persons of the Trinity raised Jesus Christ from the dead. John 2:19, "Jesus answered and said to them, "Destroy this temple and in three days I WILL RASIE IT UP." John 2:21, "But He was speaking...

I'm sorry to say jaumej that your statement above is false. Isaiah 9:6 is "NOT" teaching that Jesus Christ is the person of God Father, nor is Jesus Christ the person of the Holy Spirit. What you are believing is what is known as "Modalism." This is what the Oneness Pentecostals teach and it is...

Disregard this post! IN HIM, bluto

Your contradicting yourself wansvic? When I said and others have said that water baptism is an outward sign of an inward grace you ask where is this in the Bible? I showed how in my last post to you. So the questions is, why are you now agreeing that when one is water baptized he is identifying...

Just one question? When this great event happen, what was the date of this news item or the date that the video was made? :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto

Well that's good to know that you will continue to ask questions? And so what about the religious leaders of Jesus' day refusing water baptism. What's more important them refusing water baptism or refusing to asknowledge Jesus Christ as the Son of God and the Messiah? Do you want to know...

I have to say wansvic this is one of the worst explanations I have ever heard. Of course it was "a tip off" to the Jews that the Gentiles had equal rights of salvation, everybody does after the crucifixation of Jesus Christ. This is why the Apostle Paul said at Galatians 3:28, "There is neither...

The fact still remains that at Acts 10 they received the Holy Spirit "BEFORE" they were water baptised, period. Of course your suppose to get water baptized but not getting water baptized after you have already received the Holy Spirit does not mean one is not saved anymore. Answer me this...

If I offended you I humbly apologize. That is not my intention, I'm just passionate of what I believe and sometimes I go overboard. Again, I'm sorry. :eek: IN GOD THE SON, bluto