-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
No, you literally said there is nothing wrong with dressing as the other gender. And I pointed out that you are not correct. You are not correct. I am going by the Word of God.
This is a thread made by someone who ignores biblical roles of gender, the context is clear. And you just told this person "there is nothing wrong with dressing as the opposite gender". Why would I not tell this person that it is untrue?
-
1
- Show all
Yeraza, I think she meant that there's nothing wrong with dressing as the opposite gender, in the sense of a woman wearing her husband's jacket to take out the dog in winter, for example. As opposed to a man wearing a dress simply because he wants to feel and look like a woman. I believe Tintin said he dressed up as Cleopatra or some such character, for a mystery movie night (or something) that he was a part of. Now I'm sure he only did that because it was part of a fun event, and by his own admission, doesn't make a habit of wearing dresses.. lol
My point is, there's a big difference between a man wearing women's clothes, shoes and makeup, and a woman who occasionally wears her husband's jacket to go outside on cold days. So in the context that it's NOT a daily thing, there isn't anything wrong with wearing the opposite gender's clothes, IF it's only for the purpose of going to a costume party or wearing hubby's sweatpants for pure comfort reasons.
Kilden's statement is right, and she went on to say that if it leads to a relationship that God has not intended, THEN it's a sin.
My point is, there's a big difference between a man wearing women's clothes, shoes and makeup, and a woman who occasionally wears her husband's jacket to go outside on cold days. So in the context that it's NOT a daily thing, there isn't anything wrong with wearing the opposite gender's clothes, IF it's only for the purpose of going to a costume party or wearing hubby's sweatpants for pure comfort reasons.
Kilden's statement is right, and she went on to say that if it leads to a relationship that God has not intended, THEN it's a sin.
You keep talking about context. But yet you've taken Kilden's statement out of context.. There's a long jump between a guy dressing up as a woman for a one-time event such as a costume party, and a guy who dresses as a woman daily. With the whole 9 yards, makeup, shoes, dresses, stockings, etc.. Now I dunno if this OP does that or not, but he has said that he has found christian literature which supports his gender fluid..
Heres
what was said-
This was the only mention of cross dressing in the entire post, everything after this was focused on sexuality-
The thread was about someone who ignores gender roles, and this was the comment made to this person about dressing in the clothing of the other gender-
There was no word on "but only if your playing dress-up, ect", what was said to this non gender binary person was "there is nothing wrong with dressing as the opposite gender".
Anywho, another member has pointed out the error here, so I will leave it at that : p
-
1
- Show all
- Status