Speculation. Argument from silence.
Really? So who went to Asia Minor to spread the gospel to the lost before Paul did in Acts 19?
Speculation. Argument from silence.
οὐκ δέχομαι ouk dechomaiPrecious friends, just wondering how the "deceived" (totally depraved) can
not understand God's Truth, and "had NO free will" to either accept/BELIEVE
or reject/not believe It?:
"And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because theyreceived not The Love of The Truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause GodShall Send them Strong Delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all mightbe damned who believed not The Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."(2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 AV)
Just wondering: how A Righteous God Holds the lost responsible for
"what they do not understand"? (cp "...being understood..." Romans 1:20 AV)
Amen.
Conflation is the name of the game when they are not busy rejecting, defecting, contradicting,Explain yourself if that's not above your pay grade.
Explain yourself if that's not above your pay grade.
So many does mean many.
Many is not all. So odd that the obvious has to be pointed out to you. Bizarre even."Many" is qualitative not quantitative.
Keep in mind.Really? So who went to Asia Minor to spread the gospel to the lost before Paul did in Acts 19?
Precious friends, just wondering how the "deceived" (totally depraved) can
not understand God's Truth, and "had NO free will" to either accept/BELIEVE
or reject/not believe It?:
"And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because theyreceived not The Love of The Truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause GodShall Send them Strong Delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all mightbe damned who believed not The Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."(2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 AV)
Just wondering: how A Righteous God Holds the lost responsible for
"what they do not understand"? (cp "...being understood..." Romans 1:20 AV)
Amen.
Right. So many does mean many. And all means all. So...since we can definitively say that Christ only paid the sins of many, we can understand that when all is employed it cannot mean all of humanity. Therefore, we look for another understanding of all. We find that understanding in all being the specific group spoken of in its entirety.
World isn't to be understood as all humanity either, for reasons previously given. So again, we look for an alternative understanding. Without going into great detail, we find the world to be from amongst all the nations, tribes, kindreds, and tongues of the world. It's notable that when Jesus prays His high priestly prayer in John 17, He specifically says He isn't praying for the world, but for those given to Him and those who will believe. This limits His prayer to believers only.
The verses in Timothy, again for reasons stated previously are limited to the all that is in view. They cannot mean all humanity as Jesus is only the Saviour of all people if all actually get saved. Likewise, the Titus verse is limited for the same reasons.
There is more that could be said, but if you aren't going to accept the truth shared here, sharing more will not help.
The larger issue of John is that people come to believe and have life in Christ. Verse 23 obviously agrees with this goal.Exactly right!
And once again CONTEXT is totally ignored in the passage.
John 17:20-23
20 "My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: 23 I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
NIV
Jesus in a real sense did pray for the world -- but not the world as FWers understand it! He prayed for the Gentiles who would be evangelized by the Jews and come to believe in him.
1. "Their message" = the gospel initially spread by Jewish believers obeying the Great Commission.
2. "Those who will believe" = Gentiles ("other sheep not of this fold", cf. Jn 10) scattered throughout the world.
3. Both Jewish and Gentiles believers are "in" but not "of" the world, anymore than Jesus was (v. 16).
4. "The world" in v.23 = the world of unbelievers who would learn about Christ by Christian testimony.
5. This world of unbelievers will learn that God had loved BELIEVERS, i.e. "loved THEM" - the same "them" as in v.21
6. The world of unbelievers = those OF this world. These are the devil's children for whom Christ did not pray.
Therefore, God "had loved" both Jewish and Gentile believers who were, are and will be *IN* the world but not *OF* it. Jesus does not say that the Father "sent me and have loved the world even as you have loved me". Therefore, "world" throughout Jn 17 is used in a qualified or limited sense to refer to believers "in" the world as one group, and unbelievers who "of" the world as the second group.
What is your take on v. 23 in the context of the chapter and the larger context of John's entire Gospel?
Many is not all. .
But are not all men totally depraved?
Equally, depraved?
The larger issue of John is that people come to believe and have life in Christ. Verse 23 obviously agrees with this goal.
Throughout the book of John, the author emphasizes the intimate nature of the relationship with Christ as including the entire Godhead, and particularly in conjunction with the Father. You find it in the prayer of Jesus as well as earlier in chapter 14 in which the intimacy of the relationship is spoken of as a tabernacling of Jesus and the Father with the believer.
The god of your understanding is unfair, you have made this abundantlyIn Calvinism, this is not an issue, the ones who are not "pre-selected" fit themselves for
destruction anyway and we should be thankful god even decided to pre-select anyone.
Why this god loves some and not others, no one really knows, we just have to accept it because he is sovereign.
By the way, FWer's, Jn 17 harmonizes beautifully with:
Matt 1:21
21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
NIV
And "his people" ain't the world (forgive my vernacular). His people are those Jesus specifically prayed for in Jn 17 and, of course, both flocks of his sheep in John 10.
Now... Hold that cup steady...
Stop shaking!
Here's a dime.
Largely agree. I wasn't trying to leave out the Spirit. Just giving a quick answer.The way they tabernacle is through the Holy Spirit who acts as a portal through which both Father and Son can enter the being indwelled. This happens when you get baptized with the Holy Spirit by Jesus Christ. When in our beings, they change our motivation for living from love of self to love of God first and all others second. With this love, we will be obeying the Spirit of the Law upon which the Letter of the Law is based. The Father chooses, the Son erases our sins, and the Holy Spirit perfects.
His people were the Jews.
He came unto his own, and his own received him not. (John 1:11)
And... He did save them from their sins!
That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe. (1 Tim 4:10)No one is going to hell for their personal sins.