Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
False of course. But what is worse is that you and your kind think that this must mean a pre-birth lottery and an inscrutable gospel message.

Bizarre indeed.


Moral of the story?

If you can not think logically?
Better to be religious, so when called a fool, you can defend yourself with something the other can not understand.
Better than typical foolishness that every unbeliever will see through.
 
Precious friends, just wondering how the "deceived" (totally depraved) can
not understand God's Truth, and "had NO free will" to either accept/BELIEVE
or reject/not believe It?:

"And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they​
received not The Love of The Truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God​
Shall Send them Strong Delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might​
be damned who believed not The Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."​

Just wondering: how A Righteous God Holds the lost responsible for
"what they do not understand"? (cp "...being understood..." Romans 1:20 AV)

Amen.
Already answered with Romans 1 v 21 which was part of your original post (is that why you
deleted it???)_... For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave

thanks to Him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Man is without excuse. Why do people question this? Bizarre.
 
I'm sure the ones who didn't hear the gospel for all those years that ensued between Acts 16-19, and who died before Paul made to Asia, and are now in hell in torment are thinking exclusion since that prohibition in Acts 16 didn't work out fine for them.

Speculation. Argument from silence.
 
Sovereign King Jesus created the one and only gospel truth proclaimed to the ends of the earth with the express purpose of insuring that no one could (or would!) believe it?

Get outta here.

Crazy stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
Already answered with Romans 1 v 21 which was part of your original post (is that why you
deleted it???)_... For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave

thanks to Him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Man is without excuse. Why do people question this? Bizarre.

Romans 1:21 states: "For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking and darkened in their foolish hearts."

The bizzare part is because Calvinists present a logic that says the ones in Romans 1:21 had to be regenerated to have such a rejection to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
ike changing the focus of the parable of the Samaritan from what it is to be a good neighbor to what is not the point Jesus was focused on ... which is why we see such carnal behavior in the pages of this thread.

"changing the focus"

Amen.
 
Yeah, this sounds soooooo self exalting:

Lord I am a sinner in need of salvation. I place my trust in you and only you.

You and all calvies believe this "self-exalting" truth.


God allows them to stay around to give us something to challenge our thinking to keep growing more in grace and knowledge.
It is a Romans 8:28 matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
The verse literally says Jesus prays for those who will believe on His name. The mental gymnastics going on is simply incredible.

Exactly right! (y)

And once again CONTEXT is totally ignored in the passage.

John 17:20-23
20 "My prayer is not for them alone.
I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: 23 I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
NIV

Jesus in a real sense did pray for the world -- but not the world as FWers understand it! He prayed for the Gentiles who would be evangelized by the Jews and come to believe in him.

1. "Their message" = the gospel initially spread by Jewish believers obeying the Great Commission.
2. "Those who will believe" = Gentiles ("other sheep not of this fold", cf. Jn 10) scattered throughout the world.
3. Both Jewish and Gentiles believers are "in" but not "of" the world, anymore than Jesus was (v. 16).
4. "The world" in v.23 = the world of unbelievers who would learn about Christ by Christian testimony.
5. This world of unbelievers will learn that God had loved BELIEVERS, i.e. "loved THEM" - the same "them" as in v.21
6. The world of unbelievers = those OF this world. These are the devil's children for whom Christ did not pray.

Therefore, God "had loved" both Jewish and Gentile believers who were, are and will be *IN* the world but not *OF* it. Jesus does not say that the Father "sent me and have loved the world even as you have loved me". Therefore, "world" throughout Jn 17 is used in a qualified or limited sense to refer to believers "in" the world as one group, and unbelievers who "of" the world as the second group.

What is your take on v. 23 in the context of the chapter and the larger context of John's entire Gospel?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
I'm sure the ones who didn't hear the gospel for all those years that ensued between Acts 16-19, and who died before Paul made to Asia, and are now in hell in torment are thinking exclusion since that prohibition in Acts 16 didn't work out fine for them.

Are you trying to tell us you know that an entire continent went to hell before acts 19? And you call us man exaulting?

God declares himself in creation to those who haven't heard the word of God yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
Exactly right! (y)

And once again CONTEXT is totally ignored in the passage.

John 17:20-23
20 "My prayer is not for them alone.
I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: 23 I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
NIV

Jesus in a real sense did pray for the world -- but not the world as FWers understand it! He prayed for the Gentiles who would be evangelized by the Jews and come to believe in him.

1. "Their message" = the gospel initially spread by Jewish believers obeying the Great Commission.
2. "Those who will believe" = Gentiles ("other sheep not of this fold", cf. Jn 10) scattered throughout the world.
3. Both Jewish and Gentiles believers are "in" but not "of" the world, anymore than Jesus was (v. 16).
4. "The world" in v.23 = the world of unbelievers who would learn about Christ by Christian testimony.
5. This world of unbelievers will learn that God had loved BELIEVERS, i.e. "loved THEM" - the same "them" as in v.21
6. The world of unbelievers = those OF this world. These are the devil's children for whom Christ did not pray.

Therefore, God "had loved" both Jewish and Gentile believers who were, are and will be *IN* the world but not *OF* it. Jesus does not say that the Father "sent me and have loved the world even as you have loved me". Therefore, "world" throughout Jn 17 is used in a qualified or limited sense to refer to believers "in" the world as one group, and unbelievers who "of" the world as the second group.

What is your take on v. 23 in the context of the chapter and the larger context of John's entire Gospel?

You keep plastering up lists of data to make it look like you know something.

Yet? Its always "so what?" stuff.
 
An unbeliever reading this thread ... would he or she know that the believers who post in this thread are one in us ??? ... would the unbelieving reader know that Thou [God] hast sent Me [the Lord Jesus Christ] ??? ... I don't think so ... not the way some treat their fellow brothers and sisters ... feeding the flesh, but is a poor witness on those who engage in such behavior ...

I do not think they concern themselves too much with harming the Gospel or being a good witness, they do fervently proselytize but they are willing to be poor witnesses because in their mind "god's pre-selected" is set and cannot changed by how they behave.

Again it is a reputation they have.
 
Take a deeper dive into this? It KILLS the calvies theology.

ROM 5:15 "But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the one the many died, much more [pollos mallon] did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many."

Shirley U. Jest! Since "by the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many", then how can you FWers claim that God's grace abounds to all mankind w/o exception? How often have you guys claimed that God gives grace to everyone to set mankind free to make a choice about the gospel message? How come the text doesn't say "abound to all"? :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightTwister
You keep plastering up lists of data to make it look like you know something.

Yet? Its always "so what?" stuff.

My "lists of data" beats your method of eisegesis any day. At least I strive to remain true to God's Word. All you want to do is pervert it, corrupt it and pollute it with your man-exalting, man-centered, man-glorifying theology.