G
Having been all over the place in your response, what exactly was your larger point? Please clarify.
No, not the word doubt. The fact that you said they were mine. They are not mine.
No, not the word doubt. The fact that you said they were mine. They are not mine.
Because I've so often heard people refer to the "real" meanings of the ancient words comprising Scripture -- and this seems to be a major point in this thread -- I was speaking to that. I'm going with the conventional wisdom on the meaning of "eternity" and the judgment of those who cling to their rebellion because a) I do not know with any kind of authority Aramaic or Greek or Hebrew, and b) at times these kinds of language studies have been used to pervert the meaning of Scripture, even to the point of calling sin non-sin.
So, when someone says -- not sure if you did specifically, but someone here did say -- that the ancient language really means something different than the great majority of Christian thinkers have put forth, I'm inclined to doubt such claims and stick to the general opinion of Christendom.
But, in the end, is it a core issue? I don't think so. Secondly, does it ultimately make a difference? I mean, does anyone want to be burned up in one fell swoop? Does anyone want to have their self-awareness maintained while experiencing torture for the next 2 trillion years and beyond? I find neither prospect appealing. I'm sure you do too.
I don't know if this clears things up. If it doesn't, I'm sorry.