Under the old covenant Moses told the people if they obeyed the law given at Sanai, that would be their righteousness(deut6:25)
Paul said: Christ is the end of the law unto righteousness for everyone who believeth Rom10:4
As Moses knew people sinned, and the law would convict them of sin, was he wrong, and was Paul wrong to believe righteousness of obeying the law was in place? Forgiveness of sin was available for people under righteousness of obeying the law.
Saul the Pharisee, though he sinned believed he was under righteousness of observing the law as a Pharisee.
Did Saul or anyone else stop believing they were under righteousness of obeying the law when they sinned?
How could you POSSIBLY think that you lived under the righteousness of observing the law if it convicted you of sin???
This is very strange. According to such logic, no one lived under righteousness of obeying the law under the OC
Why would you call it "righteousness" if it didn't make you righteous before God???
The law does not make anyone righteous. Man is to obey it as the condition to be in a righteous state before God. As mentioned, forgiveness is still available for transgression under righteousness of obeying the law
The difference between being or not being under the law is this. If you are not under the law, the law cannot condemn you. Now before I get the response. ‘’But the law does not condemn you if you can seek forgiveness for sin under the law’’
There is a huge difference btween the two. As Paul knew!!