you need to take his word seriouslyGood everytime I take a bath or wash my hands.
"-)
you need to take his word seriouslyGood everytime I take a bath or wash my hands.
"-)
Jesus said if He did not depart the Holy Ghost would not come. He went on to say He would send the Holy Ghost from the Father after He departed. Acts 2:4 is when this occurred; Peter confirmed it was when, as Jesus promised, He shed forth the Holy Ghost. (Acts 2:32-33)The quote was from the NKJV, so in the KJV, yes, the word SINCE they both actually say what they say.
NO, every person saved has the Holy Spirit in them. The empowering of the Holy Spirit can happen at salvation after salvation before water baptism during water baptism before water baptism as shown in the Book of Acts.
The Apostles had the Holy Spirit before Pentecost, as John chapter 20 shows us. Ans John chapters 14 to 16, as Jesus taught on the Holy Spirit.
If Paul believed the Holy Ghost was automatically received at the point of belief why would he ask the group if they had received the Holy Ghost since they believed? His question indicates He thought the group already believed and there was the possibility that they had not yet received the Holy Ghost.The quote was from the NKJV, so in the KJV, yes, the word SINCE they both actually say what they say.
NO, every person saved has the Holy Spirit in them. The empowering of the Holy Spirit can happen at salvation after salvation before water baptism during water baptism before water baptism as shown in the Book of Acts.
The Apostles had the Holy Spirit before Pentecost, as John chapter 20 shows us. Ans John chapters 14 to 16, as Jesus taught on the Holy Spirit.
When a publication such as the Didache expresses concepts that go directly against the word of God I opt to believe the word God.It is history, Chruch Fathers were taught by the Apostles.
The word of God is a first hand account of what the apostles taught. The bible informs man to earnestly seek out the faith that was once given to the apostles. (Jude 3) Where does one go to search out this information? The Bible. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works." 2 Tim 3:16-17It is history, Chruch Fathers were taught by the Apostles.
Jesus said if He did not depart the Holy Ghost would not come. He went on to say He would send the Holy Ghost from the Father after He departed. Acts 2:4 is when this occurred; Peter confirmed it was when, as Jesus promised, He shed forth the Holy Ghost. (Acts 2:32-33)
STATEMENTS MADE BY JESUS:
John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
John 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
John 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
THE FULFILLMENT OF WHAT JESUS STATED:
Acts 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
Acts 2:32-33 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
If Paul believed the Holy Ghost was automatically received at the point of belief why would he ask the group if they had received the Holy Ghost since they believed? His question indicates He thought the group already believed and there was the possibility that they had not yet received the Holy Ghost.
The following scripture reveals IN and COME UPON are one in the same experience:The Holy Spirit never left. The Holy Spirit was well seen in the Ministry of Christ. The Holy could come Upon the disciples Because Jesus was still with them. Yet the Holy Spirit was still present.
God can be Near and distant at the same time because God is not controlled by time, space, or matter.
The Holy Spirit can be in yet not come upon. What is also known as the Unction Of the Holy Spirit 1 John 2:18-27.
The Holy Spirit departed from Samson, Yet God was still present. You limit the Spirit of God because you do not understand what Jesus is saying about
The Holy Spirit. He the Comforter who I will send in my name will be IN you and Come upon you two different things
Yet Near and Distant.
I disagree.The following scripture reveals IN and COME UPON are one in the same experience:
Notice Jesus said, "But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is COME UPON you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth." (Acts 1:8) This occurred on the Day of Pentecost: "And they were all FILLED WITH the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." (Acts 2:4)
Also relevant to the topic: Jesus said the HS was dwelling WITH the apostles but would be IN them:
"And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." John 14:16
"But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." John 14:26
The scriptures I noted reveal the truth whether or not a person chooses to accept them. And no worries, I know the Comforter is the Holy Ghost. The scripture I provided reveals that as well:I disagree.
They are shown as two distinct things or works of the Holy Spirit. Acts 1:8 Peter and the Apostles received the Holy Spirit. They were told by Jesus to wait until they were empowered from on High. Luke and Acts are two books by the same person. So, if you read the ending of Luke-Acts chapter 1, pick it up from there. If there were the same thing why did they have to wait? What power did they need IF they had all? FYI, the context of "Comforter " is the Holy Spirit. The disciples did not understand this until the resurrection. As John chapter 14 was before the Cross.
The scriptures I noted reveal the truth whether or not a person chooses to accept them. And no worries, I know the Comforter is the Holy Ghost. The scripture I provided reveals that as well:
The following scripture reveals IN and COME UPON are one in the same experience:
Notice Jesus said, "But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is COME UPON you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth." (Acts 1:8) This occurred on the Day of Pentecost: "And they were all FILLED WITH the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." (Acts 2:4)
Also relevant to the topic: Jesus said the HS was dwelling WITH the apostles but would be IN them:
"And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." John 14:16
"But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." John 14:26
he said the scripture I noted reveals the truth.you explain how the Holy Spirit would come upon Kings, Prophets and Judges and would also depart?
Was it not David who said, "Do not take thy Holy Spirit from me"? Ps 51:11
Was it not Samson that the Spirit of God departed, and HE did not know it? Judges 16:20
And was it not the Lord who said in John 14
that the Comforter would be with you AND in you 14:17
The very Greek translation for "Comforter is paraklētos = summoned, called to one's side or one who comes alongside.
They are not the same thing upon and in context to the Holy Spirit because the bible shows they are different.
The Apostles received the Holy Spirit in John chapter 20 and then waited to receive power, as we see in Acts 2:38 .
Your idea of revealing truth is not going to dismiss the word of God presented in context to the topic. I think it is also wrong for you to suggest that you "revealed the truth." It is wrong if one does not accept it. The word of God speaks the truth, and Jesus is the Truth. And you and I can only tell the truth. You do not reveal the truth. For you to say, such a thing is an error.
Your accusation is unfounded. I did not say I revealed truth. I said, I shared scripture that revealed the truth. I am nobody, scripture is the word of God.you explain how the Holy Spirit would come upon Kings, Prophets and Judges and would also depart?
Was it not David who said, "Do not take thy Holy Spirit from me"? Ps 51:11
Was it not Samson that the Spirit of God departed, and HE did not know it? Judges 16:20
And was it not the Lord who said in John 14
that the Comforter would be with you AND in you 14:17
The very Greek translation for "Comforter is paraklētos = summoned, called to one's side or one who comes alongside.
They are not the same thing upon and in context to the Holy Spirit because the bible shows they are different.
The Apostles received the Holy Spirit in John chapter 20 and then waited to receive power, as we see in Acts 2:38 .
Your idea of revealing truth is not going to dismiss the word of God presented in context to the topic. I think it is also wrong for you to suggest that you "revealed the truth." It is wrong if one does not accept it. The word of God speaks the truth, and Jesus is the Truth. And you and I can only tell the truth. You do not reveal the truth. For you to say, such a thing is an error.
You may want to reread the scripture. It actually says, he (the Comforter) dwells with you, meaning at that time, but would be IN them; meaning in the future:...
And was it not the Lord who said in John 14
that the Comforter would be with you AND in you 14:17
...
Foreshadowing the baptism into Jesus when/where none get wet with water, yes, I agree.
As foreshadows, they certainly make it very clear that saving baptism does not get anyone wet.
The enemy's tactic hasn't changed; he's still twisting God's word. Has God said? (Gen. 3:1) Did God really say water baptism in the name of Jesus is for remission of sin? Oh, no. It can't be. How stupid people are to believe being dunked does anything other than get a person wet....
It’s hard to I deeersns what people have against baptism for remission of sins it’s a beautiful design of God for remission of sins a simple action of faith based on his word
Yea there’s alot of doctrine out there tbat we can hear and believeThe enemy's tactic hasn't changed; he's still twisting God's word. Has God said? (Gen. 3:1) Did God really say water baptism in the name of Jesus is for remission of sin? Oh, no. It can't be. How stupid people are to believe being dunked does anything other than get a person wet.
The truth is those with the stain of sin will not enter heaven. Period.
You don't know how to read, and I provided his very comments.he said the scripture I noted reveals the truth.
Not I am revealing the truth.
Don't twist his words.
I did read it. And you are incorrect Jesus said as HE said it in John chapter 14.You may want to reread the scripture. It actually says, he (the Comforter) dwells with you, meaning at that time, but would be IN them; meaning in the future:
"Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." John 14:17