"The rich man And Lazarus..."

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Webers.Home

Well-known member
May 28, 2018
5,770
1,066
113
Oregon
cfbac.org
.
Except your narrative doesn’t exist in the Old Testament or New Testament

It's a waste of your time trying to gaslight me. I'm not listening to you. In
my opinion your kind are no different than the Serpent who told Eve; "You
shall not die".
_
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
The “forever” torment in Revelation 20:10 isn’t literal. Many times in the Bible forever isn’t literally forever.
Your opinion is so biased you have no idea. When John used the specific time frame of "day and night" and then "for ever and ever" he surely WAS being quite literal. But that goes against your opinions, so you just reject it.

There’s probably at least a dozen or so such cases.
When "day and night" are included, it IS literal, obviously.

If Revelation 20:10 is literal then it only applies to three persons, not all of the unsaved.[/QUOTE ]
Pure presumption. You have NO evidence that only 3 are in the LOF. There are ALL of the fallen angels as well. Unnumbered millions, probably. Whatever. Matt 25:41 says "the devil AND his angels". So, WAY MORE than your measly 3.

There is NO REASON to presume that being in the LOF literally for ever stops at the devil and angels, when the text immediately goes to the GWT judgment, where all the unbelievers are cast into the LOF.

Show me a verse that "spares" all unbelievers from being tormented for eternity.

There’s no way to apply what specifically applies to three persons to everyone.
There is every way. In fact, the flow of the text would not even suggest that none of the GWT unbelievers will cease to exist.

If you wish to do so then you must admit that’s your opinion and the inference you’re seeking to draw from it.
Yeah, talk about opinions. You take the cake.

John 3:16 says those who believe have eternal life. Those who don’t perish. It’s very plain.
When the resurrected and still mortal body is resurrected for the GWT and then cast into the LOF, you'd better bet that mortal body will perish.

You seem allergic to the idea that perishing, being destroyed, etc only refers to bodies.

And there are NO verses that say God will kill any soul. Yes, He CAN, but you have NO evidence that He will.
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
You want to charge me with a mistake??!!

Right. Your mistake is claiming that dead souls will be tormented in the LOF.

Do you not understand how silly that sounds? How do you torment anything that is dead? Dead things don't feel. You CAN'T torment them.
That's why the unsaved bodies at the end of this world will resurrected to house their dead souls.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,735
29,095
113
It's a waste of your time trying to gaslight me. I'm not listening to you. In my opinion
your kind are no different than the Serpent who told Eve; "You shall not die".
_
That's what ECTers say. They talk as if the soul of man is inherently immortal against the very words of Scripture.
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
I don't care. It says "able to", not WILL.

You need to read more slowly.
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

"Them" does not refer to God. Because man cannot kill the soul but they can kill the body.
"him" refers to Jesus. Jesus will destroy both body and soul in the lake of fire.

You said the unsaved bodies will be burned up and only the unsaved souls will be tormented in the lake of fire

According to Jesus, you are wrong.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
You want to charge me with a mistake??!!

Right. Your mistake is claiming that dead souls will be tormented in the LOF.

Do you not understand how silly that sounds? How do you torment anything that is dead? Dead things don't feel. You CAN'T torment them.
That's why the unsaved bodies at the end of this world will resurrected to house their dead souls.
It seems you really don't know what you are saying.

So, God resurrects mortal bodies BACK to life and puts a DEAD soul in it??? Why would He do that? Can you explain?

The body only has life when it has a soul. When the soul leaves, the body is dead. Why put a dead soul in a living body?

What will you or God have created? A monster like Frankenstein? A soulless body? lol.

James 2:26 - As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

The bolded words are the definition of physical death. When your soul leaves your body, your body goes limp.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Webers.Home said:
It's a waste of your time trying to gaslight me. I'm not listening to you. In my opinion
your kind are no different than the Serpent who told Eve; "You shall not die".
That's what ECTers say. They talk as if the soul of man is inherently immortal against the very words of Scripture.
You're one to talk. You can't even show any verse showing that God WILL kill souls. And all of you types ignore your problem.

All you can quote is a verse that God is ABLE TO kill souls. But that isn't the same as God actually killing souls.

As I told another denier, I am able to kill lots of people, but I have NEVER killed anyone.

So, being able is far different than actually DOING it.

Believers are ABLE TO sin as much as any unbeliever, but the vast majority don't. Same principle.

Being able isn't doing. You need to learn the difference.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
I don't care. It says "able to", not WILL.

You need to read more slowly.
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

"Them" does not refer to God. Because man cannot kill the soul but they can kill the body.
"him" refers to Jesus. Jesus will destroy both body and soul in the lake of fire.
You CANNOT prove your opinion with Scripture.

You said the unsaved bodies will be burned up and only the unsaved souls will be tormented in the lake of fire
That is the obvious conclusion for those without your biases.

According to Jesus, you are wrong.
lol. What verse SAYS that God WILL kill souls? You don't have any. You don't have any ammo.
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
FreeGrace2 said:
You want to charge me with a mistake??!!

Right. Your mistake is claiming that dead souls will be tormented in the LOF.

Do you not understand how silly that sounds? How do you torment anything that is dead? Dead things don't feel. You CAN'T torment them.

It seems you really don't know what you are saying.

So, God resurrects mortal bodies BACK to life and puts a DEAD soul in it??? Why would He do that? Can you explain?

The body only has life when it has a soul. When the soul leaves, the body is dead. Why put a dead soul in a living body?

What will you or God have created? A monster like Frankenstein? A soulless body? lol.

James 2:26 - As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

The bolded words are the definition of physical death. When your soul leaves your body, your body goes limp.
I said nothing about putting a dead soul into a live body. That's why I asked you about Ezekiel. What was the breathe of the four winds that went into the resurrected of those men?
 
Sep 19, 2022
43
2
8
So what is the deal with Acts 2? Please be more specific.


How does this contradict anything I said?


OK, confused one, let's do this slowly.

In v.29 Peter was referring to the BODY of David, which WAS dead and WAS buried. In a tomb. Got it. There is nothing about his soul.

And speaking of David, please explain what he said about his 7 day old son:

2 Sam 12:23 - But now that he is dead, why should I go on fasting? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me.”

This is very clear. David knew his son was in Paradise and was not coming back to earth to David. But David would "go to him".

So much for the SDA theory of soul sleep.
In response to Acts 2 when Peter said David is in his tomb (2:29) and that David didn't ascend to heaven (2:34)

You said, "David was also in Paradise, because Jesus had not been ascended yet. David is now in heaven."

You're saying, at the time of Pentecost when Peter is speaking Acts 2, that Jesus had not yet ascended. However, we know from Acts 1 that Acts 2 is 50 days AFTER Christ ascended.

That's a contradiction, and instead of admitting you made a mistake and moving on from it, you are trying to back peddle your way out.

Theological gymnastics of 2:29 saying it was his body and not his soul, but you neglect to answer for 2:34
34 “For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself:

Thank you for revealing that your intention is not truth; it's that you're right everyone else is wrong.

If you understood the argument Peter was making in Acts 2:25, when he quotes the OT:


Acts 2:25

25 For David says concerning Him (Christ):

‘I foresaw the Lord always before my face,
For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken.
26 Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad;
Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope.
27 For You will not leave my soul in Hades,
Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.

28 You have made known to me the ways of life;
You will make me full of joy in Your presence.’

Psalm 16:8-11

8 I have set the Lord always before me;
Because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved.
9 Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoices;
My flesh also will [a]rest in hope.
10 For You will not leave my soul in [b]Sheol,
Nor will You allow Your Holy One to [c]see corruption.

11 You will show me the path of life;
In Your presence is fullness of joy;
At Your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

Even though David wrote Psalm 16, Peter is pointing out that Psalm 16 CANNOT be referring to David himself BECAUSE David saw death, and saw corruption and is still in his tomb.

29 “Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day.

Then Peter goes on and adds in addition to Psalm 16 NOT referring to David himself but rather another, that David didn't ascend to Heaven and then quotes Psalm 110:

Acts 2:34
New King James Version
34 “For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself:

‘The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,


Psalm 110:1-7
The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.”

2 The Lord shall send the rod of Your strength out of Zion.
Rule in the midst of Your enemies!

3 Your people shall be volunteers
In the day of Your power;
In the beauties of holiness, from the womb of the morning,
You have the dew of Your youth.
4 The Lord has sworn
And will not relent,
“You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek.” (Hebrews 7:1-3)


5 The Lord is at Your right hand;
He shall [a]execute kings in the day of His wrath.
6 He shall judge among the nations,
He shall fill the places with dead bodies,

He shall execute the heads of many countries.
7 He shall drink of the brook by the wayside;
Therefore He shall lift up the head.

Peter's argument to his Jewish audience is Psalm 16 & Psalm 110 both written by David was referring to Christ NOT David himself. Christ being the only one to not remain in their tomb and the only one who ascended to heaven.

Which is exactly what John says, that the only man to be in heaven is the Son.
John 3:13

13 No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man [a]who is in heaven.
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
FreeGrace2 said:
I don't care. It says "able to", not WILL.

You need to read more slowly.

You CANNOT prove your opinion with Scripture.


That is the obvious conclusion for those without your biases.


lol. What verse SAYS that God WILL kill souls? You don't have any. You don't have any ammo.
Let's make this simple.
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Who are "them"
Who is "him"
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
Thanks for asking. Yes, I sure did.


That is what the Bible says. So I will say it a well.


Please take my advice and read it again, but S L O W L Y this time.

You have tried to CHANGE the Word of God by your bias.

"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell."

Where do you see the words "will be" anywhere in that verse?

You DON'T because they aren't there. All you will see if your eyes are open are the words "who CAN desstroy both soul and body in hell".

btw, "hell" isn't the LOF. The Greek for "hell" is Hades, and is where Jesus went to "preach to the spirits in prison after His death on the cross.

Now that we've crossed that hurdle, what verse SAYS that God WILL destroy souls?
So now unsaved bodies and souls are in Hades, and not in the grave?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
I said nothing about putting a dead soul into a live body.
Well, you actually did do that.

Post 529: I was just pointing out the mistake FreeGrace2 made. The unsaveds' resurrected bodies and their dead souls will be tormented in the lake of fire.

I never said anything about dead souls since I don't believe is any such thing.

That's why I asked you about Ezekiel. What was the breathe of the four winds that went into the resurrected of those men?
Would you please give me a citation so I can examine the text myself? I have no idea what you are referring to. Thanks.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
In response to Acts 2 when Peter said David is in his tomb (2:29) and that David didn't ascend to heaven (2:34)
V.34 - 34 For David did not ascend to heaven, and yet he said, “ ‘The Lord said to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand

I guessed you missed the "and yet he said" part. Peter noted that WHEN David said what he said, he had not ascended to heaven.

Peter never said that David wasn't in heaven now (Peter's time).

You said, "David was also in Paradise, because Jesus had not been ascended yet. David is now in heaven."
I did. And he is.

You're saying, at the time of Pentecost when Peter is speaking Acts 2, that Jesus had not yet ascended.
Please show me. I reject even thinking that.

However, we know from Acts 1 that Acts 2 is 50 days AFTER Christ ascended.
You've already shown some reading problems, so what you say isn't based on what the Bible says.

That's a contradiction, and instead of admitting you made a mistake and moving on from it, you are trying to back peddle your way out.
If you had read BETTER, you wouldn't be saying any of that now. It's your questionable reading skills that have gotten in the way.

Theological gymnastics of 2:29 saying it was his body and not his soul, but you neglect to answer for 2:34
34 “For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself:
OK, one more time. In David's lifetime and even after death, he did not ascend into the heavens. Then Peter quotes what David said when he was alive.

Are we clear yet?

Thank you for revealing that your intention is not truth; it's that you're right everyone else is wrong.
Rather, thank YOU for revealing your questionable reading skills. You might want to seek lessons.

If you understood the argument Peter was making in Acts 2:25, when he quotes the OT:

Acts 2:25

25 For David says concerning Him (Christ):

‘I foresaw the Lord always before my face,
For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken.
26 Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad;
Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope.
27 For You will not leave my soul in Hades,
Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.

28 You have made known to me the ways of life;
You will make me full of joy in Your presence.’
OK, v.27 PROVES that I am right. David knew full well that he would go to Hades when he died. And David is NOW in heaven, and has been since Jesus took all the occupants of Paradise to heaven.

Psalm 16:8-11

8 I have set the Lord always before me;
Because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved.
9 Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoices;
My flesh also will [a]rest in hope.
10 For You will not leave my soul in [b]Sheol,
Nor will You allow Your Holy One to [c]see corruption.

11 You will show me the path of life;
In Your presence is fullness of joy;
At Your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

Even though David wrote Psalm 16, Peter is pointing out that Psalm 16 CANNOT be referring to David himself BECAUSE David saw death, and saw corruption and is still in his tomb.
Actually, most of the Psalm is David talking to the Lord. In v.10a he IS referring to himself. But in v.10b he notes that the Messiah won't see corruption. According to Jewish practices, a body begins to decay in 4 days. Jesus was in the grave 3.

29 “Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day.
Doesn't prove anything. Other than David has died and his body has decayed in the tomb.

I'm not going to address the rest of your post, since you began your post demonstrating some obvious reading problems.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Let's make this simple.
Oh, I love simple. In fact, I practice the K.I.S.S. principle.

Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Who are "them"
Who is "him"
"them" is people. "Him" is God.

Any more questions?

Oh, I have one. Do you think that "able to" is synonymous with "will"?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Thanks for asking. Yes, I sure did.

That is what the Bible says. So I will say it a well.

Please take my advice and read it again, but S L O W L Y this time.

You have tried to CHANGE the Word of God by your bias.

"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell."

Where do you see the words "will be" anywhere in that verse?

You DON'T because they aren't there. All you will see if your eyes are open are the words "who CAN desstroy both soul and body in hell".

btw, "hell" isn't the LOF. The Greek for "hell" is Hades, and is where Jesus went to "preach to the spirits in prison after His death on the cross.

Now that we've crossed that hurdle, what verse SAYS that God WILL destroy souls?
So now unsaved bodies and souls are in Hades, and not in the grave?
Why do you persist in these silly questions?

I've NEVER EVER said anything about "dead souls" and reject the idea that a soul will die. So you may stop trying to put words into my mouth.

And I NEVER EVER said there are dead bodies in Hades rather than the grave.

You are really demonstrating some poor reading skills. You don't even know what I have said, obviously.

So, why should I continue a discussion with someone who doesn't follow what I say, and just goes off with nutty ideas that I fully reject?
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
Well, you actually did do that.

Post 529: I was just pointing out the mistake FreeGrace2 made. The unsaveds' resurrected bodies and their dead souls will be tormented in the lake of fire.

I never said anything about dead souls since I don't believe is any such thing.
Again, where do you see in quote above that I wrote dead souls being put into resurrected bodies?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Well, you actually did do that.

Post 529: I was just pointing out the mistake FreeGrace2 made. The unsaveds' resurrected bodies and their dead souls will be tormented in the lake of fire.

I never said anything about dead souls since I don't believe is any such thing.
Again, where do you see in quote above that I wrote dead souls being put into resurrected bodies?
"The unsaveds' resurrected bodies and their dead souls"

Do you think that the bodies and souls won't be united?
 

Saul-to-Paul

Junior Member
Jun 5, 2017
403
71
28
Why do you persist in these silly questions?

I've NEVER EVER said anything about "dead souls" and reject the idea that a soul will die. So you may stop trying to put words into my mouth.

And I NEVER EVER said there are dead bodies in Hades rather than the grave.
You just wrote to me Matthew 10's hell is Hades not the lake of fire.
You just wrote to me that God will destroy both soul and body in Hades
Does that not mean dead bodies are going to Hades?
Does hell have a double meaning there? Or are you just double minded. 🤣
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.