You have it exactly backwards.Your disagreement is with God's word .......not me.
Peace.
You have it exactly backwards.Your disagreement is with God's word .......not me.
Peace.
Gen 1:26 refutes your view.Easily.....God can and has manifested Himself in as many ways as He wishes, in as many places as He chooses, in as many formats as He wishes and ..... all at the same time.
At times...I wonder if some of us forget that we are speaking of THE GOD. This thread is an example of such.
Jesus does in fact ascend to be outside of time (existing side-by-side with the Father in all of eternity) after having descended to become a Man. So, the Son, while He was begotten in the incarnation, exists at the beginning of time where God spoke in Genesis 1:26.Your explanation doesn't work.
Genesis 1 alone refutes your view.
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Your God <fify> is schizoprenic.
They are not unbiblical.And I believe your views are unbiblical.
I face no peril. I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep that which I've committed to Him for that day.
How 'bout that! You admit that the Son and Father exist SIDE BY SIDE! yep!Jesus does in fact ascend to be outside of time (existing side-by-side with the Father in all of eternity) after having descended to become a Man.
The key to Gen 1:26 is that the Godhead acknowledged each other. "Let US"..."in OUR image".So, the Son, while He was begotten in the incarnation, exists at the beginning of time where God spoke in Genesis 1:26.
They are.They are not unbiblical.
Explain this "peril" that you speak of.It is sad when a person who is facing peril thinks that he is facing no peril. Because no amount of warning him about the peril will succeed at getting him to avoid the danger that he is facing. He will go headlong into that danger thinking that he is in no danger. The result: the danger will overtake him.
You have it exactly backwards.
Gen 1:26 refutes your view.
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Your god is schizophrenic.
Jesus does in fact ascend to be outside of time (existing side-by-side with the Father in all of eternity) after having descended to become a Man. So, the Son, while He was begotten in the incarnation, exists at the beginning of time where God spoke in Genesis 1:26.
How 'bout that! You admit that the Son and Father exist SIDE BY SIDE! yep!
They are not unbiblical.
They are.
Explain this "peril" that you speak of.
I guess you failed to recognize that I was quoting 2 Tim 1:12.
They are not unbiblical.
It is sad when a person who is facing peril thinks that he is facing no peril. Because no amount of warning him about the peril will succeed at getting him to avoid the danger that he is facing. He will go headlong into that danger thinking that he is in no danger. The result: the danger will overtake him.
You didn't read what I posted very clearly, did you.I would not call God backwards.
Gen 1:26 has EVERYTHING to do with this. It proves your theory wrong.Has nothing to do with the point that you are wrong on.
Of course I'm not referring to God in those terms. I AM, however, referring to YOUR VIEW of Him in those terms.With you referring to God in those terms...we are done here.
Was He talking to Himself?Correct...the reason God said..... make man in our image.
You keep going back and forth on your theory. How can they be "one Spirit" if they can be side by side?Of course....because I believe in the Trinity.
Now, are you willing to admit that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are one Spirit (John 4:24, Ephesians 4:4)?
I knew that you were quoting a scripture...however you were quoting it incorrectly if it does not apply to you. [/QUOT]
Well, you see, there is where you are wrong again. It does apply to me.
Why would you think I would quote a verse that doesn't apply to me?
Orthodoxy in the Trinity is believing in 3 separate Persons, all with the same attributes and characteristics of Deity.The creeds declare that if anyone is a Tritheist, they are outside the bounds of orthodoxy and do not have eternal life (from my memory of them).
I do believe in water baptism but it is not saving, you have a problem in that Noah was saved not by the water but by being in the ark nor was sin washed away for soon he was naked and drunk and his son was even worse in that he mocked [and worse] his father's nakedness.1 Peter 3:20-21
“...God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:”
I believe the water mentioned in 1 Peter 3:20-21 pertains to water baptism for the following reasons:
1.The water was the means God used to carry Noah and his family to safety. The sin of the world was washed away in the flood waters. The like figure or antitype is the NT water baptism. (Acts 2:38, 22:16)
2. Notice verse 21 makes specific mention of the process having nothing to do with the removal of filth from the flesh. (This is a reference to bath water) Thus, the comment points to a spiritual transaction taking place.
3. The scripture mentions that baptism is the answer of a good conscience toward God. Our own behavior, and in this particular case getting baptized, is what prompts a good conscience. The result is to be free of guilt. God is the giver of the Holy Ghost and we have no control over that other than asking for Him to give it.
4. Lastly, the scripture specifies this is only made possible by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
You keep going back and forth on your theory. How can they be "one Spirit" if they can be side by side?
I've heard of split personality, but how do you explain one Spirit being side by side with himself?
I do believe in water baptism but it is not saving, you have a problem in that Noah was saved not by the water but by being in the ark nor was sin washed away for soon he was naked and drunk and his son was even worse in that he mocked [and worse] his father's nakedness.
The power in Peter's reference is that baptism is an appeal to God for a good conscience, it is our testimony that we have believed God that judgement will come and we have fled to God for mercy just as Noah did, the resurrection of Jesus Christ [who is that ark] justifying our faith.
I have been in troubles when I have been obliged to remind God that I am His baptized child. And it is always good to remind the devil.
Paul is defo speaking about water bappo when he says "we have been buried with Christ and are raised up to walk in newness of life"
You are describing separate Persons.One is a Spirit without flesh and the other is the same Spirit dwelling in flesh.
It seems you don't understand Luke 23:46. Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit.” When he had said this, he breathed his last.The Spirit descended into time and took on an added nature of human flesh. In doing so, He did not VACATE ETERNITY.
Then, from the perspective of time, Jesus (the Spirit become flesh) released His Spirit back into eternity (Luke 23:46). This was the same Spirit (Ephesians 4:4) who was God (John 4:24).
No, again, 1 Pet 3:21 says that literal water (this water) symbolizes the baptism of the Holy Spirit.While water baptism in Jesus' Name does not remove the filth of the flesh (1 Peter 3:21), it does wash away sins (Acts 22:16).