lol my point was the Calvin debate is heated right now. It’s so bad many have gotten BannedPeter was not a Calvinist. 1 Peter 1:2
They rejected it. A thread that asked people to interact with 1 Peter 1:2.
Interesting...
That’s not Calvin, that’s Peter
Sorry, eleventh. Can’t answer your question. If you want an answer, PM me.
lol my point was the Calvin debate is heated right now. It’s so bad many have gotten Banned
The issue is people on both sides stopped Learning how to discuss. And it’s all out war. That was My point.
Eleven is probably egging you on. I can not see what she posts but I see you answered her
Just look election or Calvinism. Or anything that could cause a Calvinist debate
Please keep on ignore and do not try to read my mind.... I am not egging him on I am trying understand how he can divorce two concepts that are intertwined.
No one is forcing you to participate and I am sure @OIC1965 as a grown man can let me know if he does not want to discuss it with me.
Eleventh hour, if you sincerely are interested what my answer to your last question is you can pm me if you want.
Good luckI would love to discuss it, but not here.
Two words “According to”. Put those two words between the two concepts.
Hope you have a blessed day.
I would love to discuss it, but not here.
Two words “According to”. Put those two words between the two concepts.
Hope you have a blessed day.
She’s not egging him on whatsoever and I’m not blindly defending her because we’re friends. Her conversation with OIC is one of the utmost mutual respect.Eleven is probably egging you on. I can not see what she posts but I see you answered her
I guess things can change. Although he answered her question in his posts so not sure why she even asked which is why I questioned her motive. Just going off past experienceShe’s not egging him on whatsoever and I’m not blindly defending her because we’re friends. Her conversation with OIC is one of the utmost mutual respect.
I have to disagree with you there. The apostles were chosen for salvation.........just like every other Christian. Judas was never saved and never was going to be saved, because prophecy had to be fulfilled.Well we can leave TULIP aside but all parts of it work together are outside of scripture.
So how does God choose salvation for some without irresistible grace
Choosing the apostles was not Gods choice to salvation since Judas was not saved and therefore not about salvation.
I have to disagree with you there. The apostles were chosen for salvation.........just like every other Christian. Judas was never saved and never was going to be saved, because prophecy had to be fulfilled.
John 17:12
While I was with them, I protected and preserved them by Your name, the name You gave Me. Not one of them has been lost, except the son of destruction, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.
Evidently God is doing the choosing, and at least in some cases the non-choosing.
Ok, I think what you are saying is if God predestines certain people to be saved that in effect those chosen will eventually have to come to God in faith; therefore, such a circumstance would necessitate irresistible grace. Is this what you mean?
No, not according to John 17:12, and of course Many OT prophecies. And John 6:70.Judas was chosen by Jesus correct?
Judas was chosen by Jesus correct?
Jesus answered them, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” He was speaking about Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. For although Judas was one of the Twelve, he was later to betray Jesus. John 6:70-71No, not according to John 17:12, and of course Many OT prophecies. And John 6:70.
Unfortunately when you look at all of the relevant scriptures together as a package,
it appears as if Judas was chosen.......chosen to be the betrayer.
I am not pushing some kind of doctrine here. Just thinking out loud really.
No, not according to John 17:12, and of course Many OT prophecies. And John 6:70.
Unfortunately when you look at all of the relevant scriptures together as a package,
it appears as if Judas was chosen.......chosen to be the betrayer.
I am not pushing some kind of doctrine here. Just thinking out loud really.
You can think out loud if you would like.. I am not offended.
But I feel this casts Jesus in very bad light if Judas did not choice in the matter..... as I told you before, in this view you present, Jesus does not make a good faith offer to Judas ... and also Jesus would be quite deceptive.... by inviting Judas to be an apostle, giving him the same responsibilities, yet setting him up for failure?
Jesus invites Judas to join in good faith yet knowing that Judas will fail.