Not everyone is into American conspiracy theorists.If you have no idea who Alex Jones is. Chances are good you are Left Winged.
What about judge Judy? Does someone have to know her too, or be labelled left wing?
Haha prolly the wrong name
Not everyone is into American conspiracy theorists.If you have no idea who Alex Jones is. Chances are good you are Left Winged.
One doesn’t have to go to the level you give to be a tare.A tare, in my opinion, would be one who denies/blasphemes Christ, God, the Bible, and so on. Someone who promotes evil freely.
Along those lines.![]()
IOWs you’re sympathetic to my pain.I am not trying to be discerning. I was under the impression this was a Christian Forum. I gave everyone the benefit of the doubt until i saw you were getting nowhere with that poster.
IOWs you’re sympathetic to my pain.
They’re not friends of the Gospel, and neither are you, sackcloth.
Unless you KNOW this person to be a previously banned member you should not be accusing.
I hold Jesus to be the absolute Truth. If you do not? You are an enemy of God. Is that my opinion? It is what the Bible explicitly states. I posted the verse and asked you about it, though you went off on a tangent about opinions. If you do not believe the Bible, and what Jesus says about Himself, why would you call yourself a Christian? "You" in the general sense...
Are we allowed to know which one? No possible useful reason other than curiosity. LOLPennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.
In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
I was wondering tooAre we allowed to know which one? No possible useful reason other than curiosity. LOL
Are we allowed to know which one? No possible useful reason other than curiosity. LOL
Oh, I had a heck of a time finding that judge's name. It is Judge Jeanine Pirro![]()
Interesting point you made there. I can imagine two types of Jews on the Passover night in Egypt.
Some put their trust in the lamb blood, and just relax and enjoy the night, confident that it is sufficient.
Other Jews are more paranoid and try to help the blood with their works, praying, fasting, singing non stop to God.
In the end both houses first born are still saved because, as the main dominant view of this particular thread goes, the blood at their doorpost was sufficient.
That is how I view this never ending argument about faith alone or faith and works for salvation.![]()
PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.
In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
Your grace is much appreciated.PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.
In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
It wasn’t me or you. Just saying.Are we allowed to know which one? No possible useful reason other than curiosity. LOL
@Oncefallen, I believe it’s just a matter of time before you ban me for more than one reason, but none more so than my forthright persona.PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.
In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.