Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If you have no idea who Alex Jones is. Chances are good you are Left Winged.
Not everyone is into American conspiracy theorists.

What about judge Judy? Does someone have to know her too, or be labelled left wing?

Haha prolly the wrong name ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: star
They’re not friends of the Gospel, and neither are you, sackcloth.

Unless you KNOW this person to be a previously banned member you should not be accusing.

PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.

In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rosemaryx
I hold Jesus to be the absolute Truth. If you do not? You are an enemy of God. Is that my opinion? It is what the Bible explicitly states. I posted the verse and asked you about it, though you went off on a tangent about opinions. If you do not believe the Bible, and what Jesus says about Himself, why would you call yourself a Christian? "You" in the general sense...

Yes Jesus is the absolute truth. As long as you are a Christian, you would hold that view.

But as I have said to another here, it does not then follow that "My view of what Jesus said and meant are also the absolute truth".
 
PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.

In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
Are we allowed to know which one? No possible useful reason other than curiosity. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcontroversal
Oh, I had a heck of a time finding that judge's name. It is Judge Jeanine Pirro :geek:

In context of your earlier post I knew darn well you couldn't have meant Judge Judy since she leans heavily to the left (she endorsed Bernie early on in the primaries).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duskey
Interesting point you made there. I can imagine two types of Jews on the Passover night in Egypt.

Some put their trust in the lamb blood, and just relax and enjoy the night, confident that it is sufficient.

Other Jews are more paranoid and try to help the blood with their works, praying, fasting, singing non stop to God.

In the end both houses first born are still saved because, as the main dominant view of this particular thread goes, the blood at their doorpost was sufficient.

That is how I view this never ending argument about faith alone or faith and works for salvation. 🤗

It wasn’t just the Jews that I had in mind.
 
PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.

In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.

In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
Your grace is much appreciated.
 
Through all the time on this thread with so many naysayers, those that pushed salvation can be lost, never have I seen so many

dislikes and red x's thrown out by one single person.

Sad really.
 
PennEd is accurate in saying that people should not be accusing other users of being formerly banned users (even if you know it to be true). Persons who are suspected of being former banned users should be reported and nothing else.

In this case Duskey was correct about InHisImage being a banned user, just wrong about which one and he had been re-banned prior to me seeing the accusatory post.
@Oncefallen, I believe it’s just a matter of time before you ban me for more than one reason, but none more so than my forthright persona.

I say lovingly and respectfully that I understand, and yet for the sake of integrity, please don’t lose sight of certain antagonistic CC members poking the hornet’s nest. Godspeed. 😎