Uhh, Dave is Dcon.. and yes you are. 
Whose Dave?
More importantly am I off the hook
Whose Dave?
More importantly am I off the hook
Look....at the end of the day there is but one truth concerning everything in the bible...not two, three or 50.....Everything we believe goes to the root full stop.
The following represent the gambit of "gospels" found on this site.
a. Saved by grace through faith eternally with disciples that produce either works of gold, silver, precious stones or wood hay and stubble yet saved eternally
b. Saved by faith and kept or embellished by some sort of work, labor, law keeping, sacrament, baptism, church affiliation, sinless perfectionism, give the dog a bone addition etc....
The bible is clear, Galatians is clear....to embellish, add to, take away fro JESUS and FAITH into his work = a false gospel
A false gospel WILL NOT SAVE
PLENTEOUS in number will come before the throne
a. Claiming to KNOW JESUS <---JUST AS ALL so called believers DO
b. They will CLAIM their right to enter based upon their LISTED works in HIS NAME <--JUST as ALL Christian religion DO
Namely-->GOOD works (covers any and all good works done in his name), CASTING out demons in HIS NAME, foretelling the future in his NAME.
They are cast from his presence...WHY?
a. THEY WERE NEVER SAVED WHICH GOES TO THE ROOT OF THEIR BELIEF<---I NEVER KNEW YOU
JESUS said the wheat and tares grow together.......YOU can do 50 trillion "good works for JESUS" cast out demons, foretell the future, go to church 3 times a week your whole life, be moral, decent, pay your taxes, claim to be sinless, sing in the choir and a special every Sunday, give 50% of your income to the offering plate, and any other religious deed, creed or work your whole life and still bust hell wide open IF YOU HAVE NOT BELIEVED THE ONE AND ONLY ONE WAY INTO THE KINGDOM.
IT pleased GOD by the foolishness of preaching to SAVE THEM THAT BELIEVE.
Uhh, Dave is Dcon.. and yes you are.![]()
Oh he has a first name?
So is name Dave dcontroversal?
Does he have a middle name?
If not maybe we can give him one
Bill, you can call me anything you want to call me....just don't call meHAH
oh ok just put the phone down.
Good job you didn’t hear what I called you when I put it down.
Becuase that would be a sin, therefore a slave to sin and not a genuine believer.
Its all your fault
I think you demonstrate cognative disonance.
Jesus cleanses us and makes us holy, purifies us, and calls us His people.
For you this cleansing is not good enough, you still need God to look only to Christ.
It is like saying here is a clean plate. I will put the clean plate on top of the dirty
plate. Now all you can see is the clean plate.
I will then wash the dirty plate. It is now clean. But because of fear that it might
still be dirty I insist you only look at the orginal clean plate.
This is disbelief in the value and reality of the cleansing.
And this is not standing in ones own holiness, but in the cleansing given by Christ.
This is the gospel of promise to deliver us as a Holy people, purchased out of the world.
It is plain this gospel is not the one you actually believe in.
As far as I can see, this is what Jesus, Peter, Paul and the apostles are talking about.
It fits their words 100%, and I in fact end up using the same arguments they used, and
see why they said what they wrote. That is an odd experience, but then nothing in the
world can prepare you for the things of God, because the things of God are unique and
new to us. God bless you.
You set "the tone" when you came in telling others they don't believe portions of Scripture.
Namely me.
This was your accusation, and it was totally uncalled for. I requested you behave like an honest Christian, instead.
You were un-civil, and frankly, you lied. You didn't "misunderstand me" as you tried to claim, you simply went off with a false accusation based on nothing I stated.
I DON'T GET WHY SOME OF YOU PULL THIS ON OTHERS, BUT IT'S CALLOW, HONESTLY. AND AD NAUSEAM
I didn't care for what you did, nor how you cannot own it, but not going to tuck tail and leave over it.
Just trying to have honest discussion...expecting other believers to be, you know, honest.
So making it your mission,had nothing wrong to it?I wish I knew what you are talking about.
Someones twitter account is a public domain site.
There attitude to others is a public domain issue.
I just posted links to it, and said it appeared to be a consistent life style.
This is just observations.
The sin was lying about it, and inventing and fabricating excuses.
The proof of the reality is in deleting the account to remove the evidence.
My whole point about hacking an account, if you cannot change the contents,
and are offended, you get rid of it. Now this has happened, it is obvious this
was a choice by the owner of the account, and is a result of this interaction here.
What is amusing is how much these things matter.
For a group who claim to live without rules or condemnation, swearing is obviously
a deeply offensive sin. On the scale of heaven and hell, who is evil and who is not,
I did not know this was your touch stone, lol.
Not sure what theory you speak of....the truth bears out in my last post and yes the words eternal and everlasting are both tied unto LIFE based upon belief into the finished work of Christ on our behalf.....they were religious people who had never trusted into JESUS biblically.....there is but one GOSPEL and if you do not come by that door...you will not make it!
AND it is not ETERNAL if it can be LOST.
THANK GOD for ETERNAL SALVATION.
John 3:36 (CSBBible)
[SUP]36 [/SUP] The one who believes in the Son has eternal life,
but the one who rejects the Son will not see life;
instead, the wrath of God remains on him.
I just got home and didn't notice,oh well can't edit my post now...Stones, Joefizz, Peter got banned. He can't see your responses..
now I guess I'll move on to other threads where I can laugh at myself for this irony.I just got home and didn't notice,oh well can't edit my post now...
I want to address this now. Is the law written on our hearts for the body of Christ, or was that for Israel who was under the law?
My thought is no, it is not. We receive a new "heart". A new nature. We become Spiritual men and women, and carnality is put to death. We put our faith in this work of Jesus on a daily basis. No need for law. Law only was to point out mans sin. To show that the good of the knowledge of the wrong tree, is nothing like the good of the tree of Life, who is Jesus.
So He gives us of Himself, a measure. And our measure increases as we grow in the knowledge of Him.
This is the new covenant and the old is passing away. More and more as we gain revelation of truth.
So many here share their Faith in the Lord to be told they serve a false Prophet and have a False Gospel.. you can not serve a verse or two of Paul’s writings and proclaim all who Love and obey the Lord will be told to depart.. If it were not so serious it could be laughed off.. but it is deadly serious...
I think under the law means dead. There is a commandment contained in the law that says those who transgress God's Law dies. The wages of sin is death. This is called the "Law of sin". We are freed from this law which was against us, Christ nailed it to the cross. I think it is not true to preach that no longer being under the law means we are no longer to consider it as our instruction. Being free from the Law of sin, does not mean being free from the rest of God's instruction which defines sin. IMHO.
And the whole concept of the New Covenant was written long before Jesus the man was born. Jeremiah was instructed to write that God would write HIS Laws on our heart. So His Laws are His Laws, right? That would include His Sabbaths, and 10 Commandments for sure. He also said HE would take our sins away and remember them no more. A job that was ordained for a Levite Priest. He said He would write His Laws, so no more administration by the Levitical Priesthood.
Heb. 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,)
For these reasons I believe the Mainstream preaching regarding the New Covenant has been corrupted many years ago, the same way God's Laws were corrupted by the Pharisees hundreds of years before Jesus was sent to set them straight.
God prophesied, through His Prophets, a time when we no longer relied on a "Priesthood" to filter His Word, or the Levitical Sacrificial "works and Deeds of the Law" for remission of sins.
The administration and cleansing of sins, the Covenant God made with the Children of Israel that was ADDED to God's Laws, "Until the Seed should come" this was the old covenant. It was for the Jews. But the New Covenant:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.(Gentiles)
14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
This was the Levitical Priesthood and it's administration of God's Laws, and for the rituals for cleansing of sin which was forbidden for the "Heathen" to participate in.
Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; Jew and Gentile, all one under God's New Covenant.
But there is no scriptural support for the preaching that God's Definition of sin or instructions in righteousness had ever changed. Paul speaks to the Levitical Priesthood ceremonial, sacrificial "Works and deeds of the Law" for remission of sins, but he doesn't mean by that, the definition of sin.
This is a huge problem in Mainstream Christian understanding of what Paul preached and if one doesn't get this foundation right, it makes Paul sound as if he is preaching against Peter, against Jesus and Moses:
and sometimes against himself. Rom. 2:13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
Paul himself corrects any doubts that I had about his teaching in:
Acts 26:18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
19 Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
20 But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. (All of them, God showed no difference)
21 For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me.(Same as they did Jesus and the Prophets who came before Him)
22 Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:
Anyway, very good topic, I am an uneducated man and sometimes have difficulty explaining myself. I hope HE has given me utterance sufficient for you to understand the point on my heart.
now I guess I'll move on to other threads where I can laugh at myself for this irony.