i understand now
Israel didn't permanently stay in the earthly Canaan, but biblical interpretation explains this by distinguishing between the physical land and the spiritual fulfillment of "everlasting possession" in Olam (Hebrew for age/eternity), pointing towards a greater, heavenly inheritance and God's enduring presence with His people, fulfilled in Jesus and the New Creation, not just a temporary patch of ground. The earthly land was a foreshadowing, a promise with conditions (obedience), while the ultimate "everlasting" promise points to an eternal reality where God dwells with His people forever, as seen in the New Testament.
I share this understanding with you.
Jerusalem that is above is a reality.
The difference between spiritual and earthly Jerusalem is explained:
Galatians 4:22 "For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise."
The whole world is now under the kingship of Jesus (Luke 16:16), but does not know His voice.
Jesus is a servant king and the carnal mind only respects bullies.
The holy land is now the whole world, and the condition of faithfulness applies just as much as it did in Deuteronomy 28.
We have not been bound to the law though, so our burden is light.
