The Scripture you present is nothing more than a parable of the (Second Coming) in a list of many, not a pre-trib rapture as you claim.Nope
Jesus vividly paints a much different picture
mat 25
6 And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.
7 Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps.
8 And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out.
9 But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves.
10 And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.
11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.
12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.
13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
not even a hint of white horses or a destroyed planet with dead bodies.
the scene is total peacetime.
the wedding chamber is ALWAYS in or adjacent to the fathers house.
.....that would be heaven.
vivid,vivid depiction of the pretrib rapture
There isn't even a (Hint) of a pre-trib rapture seen in the Scripture provided, not a hint.1) Combine mat 25
2) The last supper dialogue
And
3) The first miracle at a wedding
"you saved the best for last"
2 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there:
2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage.
3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.
5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.
6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece.
7 Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.
8 And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it.
9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knewthe governor of the feast called the bridegroom,
10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.
11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.
We can all draw our own conclusions
I see;
The first miracle...it had to be the first because in heaven "the first is last"
The grapes are ripe fruit (NOT BARLEY OR WHEAT)
Wedding....it was a wedding
Both Jesus and the bridegroom are connected to the wine
ok,,,,now,,,,why is any of this significant?
Because,,,and i pondered this for years.....WHY WERE THE 144K FIRSTFRUITS?????(rev 14)
Because firstfruits PRECEDES main harvest. So there has to follow a main harvest.
bingo
Jesus on a cloud gathering ripe fruit.(again rev 14)
We see the jew (the best FRUIT / WINE) (gathered last)
The first wedding dimension Cana / last wedding dimension "CANA".
The jew is the last to come to the feast.
Rev 14 has the 144k in heaven as firstfruits
Those gathered BY Jesus on a cloud are RIPE FRUIT (not wheat or barley harvest)
Rapture DURING THE GT of the jewish believers.
The Jew is the recipient of the gt. (jacobs trouble) That trouble makes messianic Jewish converts(ripe fruit gathered)
There isn't even a (Hint) of a pre-trib rapture seen in the Scripture provided, not a hint.
Absolutely, you bounce around in another world when it comes to eschatology, it's like a fairytale dreamland
You see politics clearly, but eschatology is big smiles.
I fully understand now why you haven't been posting scripture, because there isn't any to support your claims made.
This is an out and out lie.I fully understand now why you haven't been posting scripture, because there isn't any to support your claims made
The Scripture you present is nothing more than a parable of the (Second Coming) in a list of many, not a pre-trib rapture as you claim.
I fully understand now why you haven't been posting scripture, because there isn't any to support your claims made.
24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.
25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:
26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets.
27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity.
28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.
29 And they shall come from the east, and from the west, and from the north, and from the south, and shall sit down in the kingdom of God.
Nope
Jesus vividly paints a much different picture
mat 25
6 And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.
7 Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps.
8 And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out.
9 But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves.
10 And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.
11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.
12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.
13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
not even a hint of white horses or a destroyed planet with dead bodies.
the scene is total peacetime.
the wedding chamber is ALWAYS in or adjacent to the fathers house.
.....that would be heaven.
vivid,vivid depiction of the pretrib rapture
Matthew Chapter 25 is nothing more than three different parables explaining the exact same event, the (Second Coming) and (Final Judgement)There is NOTHING of a wedding there.
See this is what i am talking about.
Your verses neither addresses post or pre trib.
mat 25 is a gathering of the bride.
That gathering has
1) NO WHITE HORSES
2) NO WARTIME/DESROYED EARTH
3) NO HINT OF A ONE WORLD SYSTEM WITH CHRISTIANS ALL DECAPITATED FOR REFUSING THE MARK
4) NO ARMY ARRAYED WITH JESUS ON A WHITE HORSE SHOOTING A DEADLY FLAME FROM HIS MOUTH
5) NOTHING BEING DESTROYED WITH THE BRIGHTNESS OF HIS PRESENCE
AND GUESS WHAT?
NIETHER DOES YOUR "DOOR SHUT" VERSES
Sooner or later you will have to face the fact that only one "coming has all that.
Are you there???? Can you actually come to terms that when Jesus comes back on a white horse IT IS COMPLETLY OUT OF YOUR RAPTURE WORK BOOK?
there are NO RAPTURE verses describing the horses,the battle,men dying at the brightness of his coming,and NO RAPTURE VERSES depicting a uturn. (which is completely made up by you guys)
NOTHING...ZERO...NADA
We own that arena friend.
The second coming is not the rapture. That is what you're failing at.
You have been duped friend.
The rapture verses do not in any way resemble the second coming on white horses.
I Agree, like falsely teaching Jesus Christ returns to earth, hanging out with mortal humans, performing animal blood sacrifice for sinI started this thread to discuss the fact that pastors refuse to preach on the Prophetic Word.
Forums like this one is the only place the prophecies are brought to light and talked about, but sadly; people with very fixed ideas of what they think God will do in the near future, get upset and nasty, when the truths of what the Prophets wrote is presented to them.
They are actually incapable of understanding the truth. Matthew 1:25, 1 Corinthians 1:19-20, Ephesians 4:18, Daniel 12:4-9
Those who do promote and teach false theories, will be shocked and surprised when things don't happen as they expected.
They will also face a more severe Judgment, at the GWT; for their promotion of false theories and doctrines. James 3:1
But 1 Thessalonians 4:17 does NOT say people who are alive and remain, [After the Great Tribulation] will be taken to heaven. It says they will be gathered to where Jesus is; initially in the clouds and then to Jerusalem. Paralleled by Matthew 24:30-31
It is a serious addition to that prophecy to think it means going to heaven, not to mention how illogical it is , as Jesus has come down from heaven as verse 16 clearly says.
2/ No, I believe the end times events will happen just as the Prophets have described.
The next prophesied event will be the Sixth Seal; a worldwide disaster that will set the scene for all the rest, from Revelation 7 to 19:11, to take place as Written.
3/ And we are One people, John 17:20-23, Ephesians 4:4-6
There is no separate Jewish redemption so as the Church can skive off to heaven, while the Jews get Tribulated. That idea is a lie upon the 'rapture' fable.
Revelation dosent have a earlier date of Revelation as preterist suggest, Iranaeus openly stated John was seen in prison at the (End) of Emperor Domitians reign, that ended in 96AD1. There won't be any of the old Jerusalem after the rapture, Christ comes at the LAST trump, the last trump signals THE END.
There will be no Jerusalem because after Christ comes for His people the earth will be DESTROYED with intense heat 2 Peter 3:10-13
The NEW Jerusalem will be in heaven.
2. Yes they certainly were fulfilled exactly. WE have every proof, for the earlier dating of Revelation, the identity of the beast, the idenity of the 5 kings, Olivet discourse and the history of the events by Flavius Josephus to show the fulfillment. We now look for His coming. Maranatha.
3. In the new covenant Jews and Gentiles in Christ are the church/Israel. No separation, I was not aware of the position you stated that Jews (those born again) were left behind. We are ALL one in Christ Jesus.
He did it before, He will do it all again.I Agree, like falsely teaching Jesus Christ returns to earth, hanging out with mortal humans, performing animal blood sacrifice for sin
1/ There won't be any of the existing Jerusalem left after the Lord's Day of fiery wrath. Amos 2:4-51. There won't be any of the old Jerusalem after the rapture, Christ comes at the LAST trump, the last trump signals THE END.
There will be no Jerusalem because after Christ comes for His people the earth will be DESTROYED with intense heat 2 Peter 3:10-13
The NEW Jerusalem will be in heaven.
2. Yes they certainly were fulfilled exactly. WE have every proof, for the earlier dating of Revelation, the identity of the beast, the idenity of the 5 kings, Olivet discourse and the history of the events by Flavius Josephus to show the fulfillment. We now look for His coming. Maranatha.
3. In the new covenant Jews and Gentiles in Christ are the church/Israel. No separation, I was not aware of the position you stated that Jews (those born again) were left behind. We are ALL one in Christ Jesus.
Revelation doesent have a earlier date of Revelation as preterist suggest, Iranaeus openly stated John was seen in prison at the (End) of Emperor Domitians reign, that ended in 96AD
(Yosef ben Matityahu AKA Flavius Josephus) was a traitor to his people the Jews, as he defected from his commanding military ranks and ran to support the Roman's in their (Propaganda Machine), he was a multiple adulterer, basking in the wives and palaces given to him by the Emperors
Your suggestion that the (New Jerusalem) comes down to this existing Earth is seeing pinocchio's nose growing again >>>>>>>>>>The new Jerusalem comes to the earth. Revelation 21:1
Correction, The Actual Revelation To John, Not His Person.Never know what you will come up with next. I'd like to look over your reference material if you are willing to share.
I had to laugh at your reference to Iranaeus about John in prison......Iranaeus wasn't born UNTIL 160AD.
And John was not in a prison (building) he was on the island of Patmos (no prison building but there is a house that John supposedly lived in. Patmos was used for political prisoners. You can visit Patmos with Google Earth.
Rev 17 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he comes, he must continue a short space. Five fallen, the first five being Julius, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius; one is: Nero, and one yet to come for short time. Galba, reigned for 10 months and 10 days. These are the only kings that fit using the 5 fallen. Julius was the first of the Caesars of the Roman empire. Nero began the persecution of the Jews and was known as the beast among the Jews.
Some have chosen Domitian with Nerva following but the Jewish wars were long over by then so would have no reason banishing John......and Nerva reigned for about 15 months, a short time but not as short as Galba.
I need to shorten this up so I won't go on.
Even as aggravating as false statements can be, I admit a get a laugh at some of them. Yours have been dillies.
Josephus actual history can be found in any enclyclopaedia
Correction, The Actual Revelation To John, Not His Person.
Domitian's Reign, 81-96AD
Polycarp was a disciple of John who saw the Revelation, Iranaeus was a disciple of Polycarp.
What Irenaeus Actually Said
Here is the oft-referenced quote from Irenaeus, the context of which is a discussion about the number and name of the Antichrist:
“Had there been any need for his name to be openly announced at the present time, it would have been stated by the one who saw the actual revelation. For it was seen not a long time back, but almost in my own lifetime, at the end of Domitian’s reign.” (Against Heresies, 5.30.3)
The phrase “it was seen” is translating a single Greek word: ἑωράθη. And this word is commonly taken to refer back to “the actual revelation” which had just been mentioned. Thus, Irenaeus would be stating that John saw his apocalyptic vision at the end of Domitian’s reign, and this would support the later date for Revelation (late-90s).
Once Again, I Referred to John Being Seen By Ireaneus I was wrong, as he referred to the (Vision) of Revelation being seen towards the end of Emperor Domitians reign 81-96ADthat isn't a definitive statement by Irenaeus at all, it refers to a person, not the Revelation. I do not believe you read all of Against Herisies.......this gleaning of other people's opinions is not impressive I would like the reference to which of the AH books that wording is in.
also what did you think you were correcting?
"Correction, The Actual Revelation To John, Not His Person" <---- your comment (I have no clue what you refer to)
Once Again, I Referred to John Being Seen By Ireaneus I was wrong, as he referred to the (Vision) of Revelation being seen towards the end of Emperor Domitians reign 81-96AD
The Revelation wasn't seen pre 70 AD as preterist Falsely claim.
Polycarp was a disciple of John who saw and wrote the Revelation, Ireaneus was a disciple of Polycarp.
(The exact statement below)
Early Christian Writings
Ireaneus: Against Heresies Book 5, Chapter 30.3
"We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For that was seen no very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian's reign."