Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Noting another tactic



My conclusion about hearing in what I said. Did I limit hearing to audible hearing or say that we'd need to look for it elsewhere?:


It looks to me knowing the intent of my interior man and reading the external presentation from it that I simply said we'd need to look elsewhere to discuss assertion that hearing is supernatural. I simply do not see it in the language of this verse and explained why.

It's wild and untamed around here.

It surely is, they read scripture through that all encompassing "calvinist" lens, and it really adds an entire interpretative layer.

So "hear" can no longer be hear as normally understood within the context of how it used in the particular text, their lens demands it be a supernatural event if the person is one of the preselected.
 
Great point. Even someone who didn't understand Chinese should be able to saved by hearing the gospel in Chinese.

That's why God created subtitles and captions and translators and...

BTW, He also did periodically supernaturally overcome linguistic barriers. Maybe He still does but I've never actually experienced it. Conflating linguistic differences with supernatural hearing is silly.
 
So what is the difference in agape and philo? I know there is Google but I also like to ask people instead of looking it up.
in a nutshell ...

agapaō is a self-sacrificial love ... for God so loved (agapaō) the world that He gave His only begotten son ...

phileō is a deep affection, close friendship, the close bond between family and friends

Here is some info from biblehub.com

Strong’s Greek 5368 (phileō) expresses warm affection, friendship, or fond attachment. While agapaō emphasizes commitment and self-giving, phileō highlights felt emotion, personal delight, and relational intimacy. The New Testament employs phileō both positively—to reveal genuine devotion between God and His people—and negatively—to expose misplaced affections that rival love for God.

if you interested in a deeper dive into these verses (John 21:16-17, please let me know and we can get into that discussion.

hope/pray you have a blessed day Jackson129 ...
.
 
Correct. Jeremiah 13 is chock full of free will, volition, choices and consequences.

And super-determinists take note: the wayward Israelites knew exactly what they were doing in sinning against the command of YHVH and were without excuse.

[Jer 13:10 KJV]
10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.

[Jer 13:11 KJV] 11 For as the girdle cleaveth to the loins of a man, so have I caused to cleave unto me the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah, saith the LORD; that they might be unto me for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory: but they would not hear.

Note the cynicism and WILLFUL rebellion noted here:

[Jer 13:12 KJV] 12 Therefore thou shalt speak unto them this word; Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Every bottle shall be filled with wine: and they shall say unto thee, Do we not certainly know that every bottle shall be filled with wine?

And yes, another swing and a miss for the super-determinists. This is to be expected as their views are contrary to Biblical truth.

What else can a sinful nature do but be willfully rebellious since those in the flesh (sin nature) cannot please God. Hence, the analogy between parts "a" and "b" of v. 13. Israel did not have the power to change its sinful nature anymore than the Ethiopian did the color of his skin or the leopard its spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
No. Which post # is the one where I supposedly posted that?
I gave the link. The first part of your post had messed up coding which looked like something someone else had said because it ended with the end quote tags, and the quote was messed up because there was no opening quote tag... so it is impossible to determine who said that opening part of the post. After the closing quote tag, is what you actually said, but heishere quoted the part before the closing quote tags.