I'm not the one who appeals to emotionalism everyday, its your imaginary empowered free will that does that.Jordon.... please.
Go take your emotions and start dumping on someone else.
I know better thanks
I'm not the one who appeals to emotionalism everyday, its your imaginary empowered free will that does that.Jordon.... please.
Go take your emotions and start dumping on someone else.
I'm not the one who appeals to emotionalism everyday, its your imaginary empowered free will that does that.
I know better thanks
well sir I don't need meds I have Gods will, that all i need, I dont need drugs meds booze, all that stuff, all that i have is enough for me,My free will is going to take a break from all your noise.
On Ignore, until your medication kicks in.
That's correct. Only in His humanity was He tempted. In His divinity, He was not. He could not sin.He made himself to be as a man, to make himself able to be temptable as we are tempted.
For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things just as we are, yet without sin. Hebrews 4:15
If he was being manifested as God?
Nothing could have tempted Him!
Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted with evil and he himself tempts no one." James 1:13
Well, Cameron?
Are you ready to take off those roller skates yet?
1Co 2:8 - Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.re: ei: if, whether, though, HELPS word studies suggests:
Accordingly, 1487 (ei) should not be translated "since," but rather always "if" – since the assumption may only be portrayed as valid (true, factual).
I'm not convinced that Satan posed the challenge to jump off the cliff expecting Jesus to jump but rather to show his lack of assurance in that had He not. Any possibilities about his exact motives are speculative, of course.
Re: the mystery hidden in Christ, that is, through Him, the world would be saved, if I'm not mistaken. So, I think it's safe to assume that, although they knew that He was aware of His authority over them, an evil spirit also knew Paul in a similar sense, saying, "I know Jesus, and I know Paul, but who are you?" Acts 19:15 so, that leaves a little room for the question of whether any of them knew Him in his fullness, the Purity of Him, unlike Paul, as the only begotten Son of God.
Heb 4:15He made himself to be as a man, to make himself able to be temptable as we are tempted.
For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things just as we are, yet without sin. Hebrews 4:15
If he was being manifested as God?
Nothing could have tempted Him!
Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted with evil and he himself tempts no one." James 1:13
Well, Cameron?
Are you ready to take off those roller skates yet?
No. Wrong.That's correct. Only in His humanity was He tempted. In His divinity, He was not. He could not sin.
Heb 4:15
†πειράω peiráō, pi-rah'-o; from G3984; to test (subjectively), i.e. (reflexively) to attempt:—assay.
to test, make trial of one, put him to the proof:
Disagree.
Jesus simply tabernacled with us in a sin soaked world, utterly imperturbable. Doing that which we cannot, demonstrating the proof of His infallible righteousness. And thereby demonstrating His qualification to be the Lamb.
The fact that He had flesh does not make Him "temptable".....His flesh must be and was also perfect, unfallen and perfectly holy.
That's correct. Only in His humanity was He tempted. In His divinity, He was not. He could not sin.
I don't see it that way. The only thing He emptied Himself of is His right to be glorified by literally everyone and everything all the time.....and by veiling Himself in flesh and not freaking everyone out with constant blazing refulgent glory. And of course dying when He never deserved it.Yet, His Deity which, prior to the Incarnation, gave him the power to be God in whatever He desired to do; was not operational in enabling his humanity. Thus... Leaving his humanity, to be humanity.
That is the catch.
Adam wasn't God in a body.Unless God created Adam with a defect?
Until Adam fell, he was perfectly holy.
I d
I don't see it that way. The only thing He emptied Himself of is His right to be glorified by literally everyone and everything all the time.....and by veiling Himself in flesh and not freaking everyone out with constant blazing refulgent glory. And of course dying when He never deserved it.
[Phl 2:7-8 KJV] 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Adam wasn't God in a body.
Not only can we exercise MFW, reality is designed in such a way that we must exercise MFW.
I just exercised MFW in saying this, and anyone who opines about my statement also exercises MFW.
back to imagining children of God are queers again,He made himself to be as a man, to make himself able to be temptable as we are tempted.
For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things just as we are, yet without sin. Hebrews 4:15
If he was being manifested as God?
Nothing could have tempted Him!
Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted with evil and he himself tempts no one." James 1:13
Well, Cameron?
Are you ready to take off those roller skates yet?
Sorry but where did Genez even mention queers, let alone say that he imagined that God's children are queers? If searched back over 5 pges of messages on this thread, and as far as I can see, you are the only person to even mention queers.back to imagining children of God are queers again,
Should this be how it is after you receive sound doctrine you decide to put us on ignore and call us queers.
Utterly disgraceful sir
here he calling Cameron a queerWhatever you say, sweetheart.
Well, Cameron?
Are you ready to take off those roller skates yet?.
Sorry, I assure you I wasn't trying to excuse anybody's behaviour. I did a search for the word "queer" on several pages of this thread, and only found it in your posts. that is why I didn't see "sweetheart." I don't understand the roller skates reference. Surely not only queers wear roller skates. If Genez was really implying that someone is a queer, I expect that would be against forum rules. I will leave that to the moderators.@DavidLamb you should not go excusing other peoples behaviour.
here he calling Cameron a queer
Here to david hes is calling Cameron a queer and there are other places to which I can't be bothered too find David,
one in particular said Cameron's understanding of of God was like listening to queers.
So if he's not cutting children of God of from the lord he's calling them queers.
It's what people who deprave themselves do, they then deprave other children of God
well they don't always come up when you do one word searches, I can assure you genez said in a post to Cameron your like listening to queers.Sorry, I assure you I wasn't trying to excuse anybody's behaviour. I did a search for the word "queer" on several pages of this thread, and only found it in your posts. that is why I didn't see "sweetheart." I don't understand the roller skates reference. Surely not only queers wear roller skates. If Genez was really implying that someone is a queer, I expect that would be against forum rules. I will leave that to the moderators.
I apologise for any confusion caused.