That's cuz it's the only tongue they know.
What if it's not actually in English but we have a gift of interpretation?
That's cuz it's the only tongue they know.
First you mention John 3:8, wherein it is stated one hears the sound of invisible wind and such is everyone born of the Spirit. But rather than accept the scriptures literal meaning, that when one is born of the Spirit there will be an accompanying sound, you give your interpretation that one can see "lives changed." Your interpretation is not consistent with what is stated.You seem to have missed the point of what Jesus was saying to Nicodemus. It was not about tongues (of any kind). Jesus simply compared the wind with the Holy Spirit.
The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
In both Hebrew and Greek, the word for spirit can also be applied to wind or breath. And both the wind and the Holy Spirit are invisible, but their effects are discernible. One can hear the wind, and one can see lives changed through the regeneration of the Holy Spirit. But it has nothing to do with tongues.
Did Paul begin to speak in tongues after he received the Holy Spirit, or did he become a bold preacher of the Gospel after having been a persecutor of Christians?
ACTS 9 (NO TONGUES JUST THE PREACHING OF THE GOSPEL)
17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.
18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.
19 And when he had received meat, he was strengthened. Then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus.
20 And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.
21 But all that heard him were amazed, and said; Is not this he that destroyed them which called on this name in Jerusalem, and came hither for that intent, that he might bring them bound unto the chief priests?
22 But Saul increased the more in strength, and confounded the Jews which dwelt at Damascus, proving that this is very Christ.
You say, self created, God's word states otherwise:people think they're speaking a real, rational language rather than something entirely self-created -
You are somebody who can interpret tongues!!? Fantastic!
Can you please interpret these tongues?
John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb. Did he ever speak in tongues? NEVERThe scripture you quote in Acts 9 does not specify that Paul spoke in tongues but does state he was filled with the Holy Ghost. How can one know what occurs when someone is filled with the Holy Ghost? Study All scriptures that pertain to receiving the Holy Ghost.
sound, in a physical sense, is any pressure wave.
it's not only 'sound' if a persons ears are able to perceive it.
This was only one time in the bible. When the Holy Spirit came for Jesus into this world. As Jesus said.Wow. Look what the bible says happens when one is filled with the Holy Ghost:
"And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." Acts 2:2-4
You are somebody who can interpret tongues!!? Fantastic!
Can you please interpret these tongues?
The scriptures I provided speak to the error in your understanding. But rather than address that you change the subject so I will comment on the points you bring up that have nothing to do with the NT rebirth.John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb. Did he ever speak in tongues? NEVER
Jesus of Nazareth was filled with the Holy Spirit from His mother's womb, and then constantly and continuously. Did He ever speak in tongues? NEVER
So there is the clearest evidence that speaking in tongues has nothing to do with being filled with the Spirit. It is the least of the spiritual gifts, therefore Paul would have rather spoken 5 intelligible words of prophecy than 10,000 words in tongues. In any event, tongues would cease, and they did cease.
I agree that it is the first time that the Holy Ghost was poured into people. However, we see it happening again in these scripture verses: Acts 8:12-18, 10:44-48, 19:1-6.This was only one time in the bible. When the Holy Spirit came for Jesus into this world. As Jesus said.
Most importantly, keep in mind that an imitation is not proof that the real thing does not exist. The bible must be our first source for instruction and understanding. (1 Cor 12)PennEd, you do have a knack for finding informative videos.....again very disturbing.![]()
I'm gonna try to answer point for point here if I can with out doing the quote for quote thing as I am doing this from my phone and that can become quite difficult.interesting but baloney
actually, the real burr under the saddle, the one that makes the good horse buck, consists of, for the most part, RUMORS
I do not know how many times I have read this posted by cessationists with no reference as to who is supposed to have posted it
on the other hand, I have seen this claim REFUTED many times and I know I have refuted it myself
so here it is being said again. it is basically a false claim around this site. there probably are people who think and believe this, but in this forum, it would be a rare thing to find
it is beyond tiresome that people continue to post that this is what is being said by those who do speak in tongues
you have taken it a step further by using what I find to be pretty offensive adjectives ... see highlighted above in your quote
you cannot sling words around like arrows in your attempt to 'prove' how much you love God because the effect it has, is that it could occasion the thought that those who speak in tongues are a bunch of judgmental hypocrites
a post like the one I quoted here, is not peace seeking and it is not truthful
sounds like you may think people who speak in tongues do NOT seek God with all their heart
if that is not what you meant to say, it is not to late to correct that impression
Most importantly, keep in mind that an imitation is not proof that the real thing does not exist. The bible must be our first source for instruction and understanding. (1 Cor 12)
I'm gonna try to answer point for point here if I can with out doing the quote for quote thing as I am doing this from my phone and that can become quite difficult.
First off, I am not a cessationist, therefore I will also answer the last point with the first. My affirmation of those (some not all) who do not speak in tongues as sincere and true worshippers of God, emphatically does not exclude those that do speak in tongues from being sincere and true worshippers of God. There most certainly are indeed many in both camps that are sincere lovers of the Lord and true worshippers.
I have indeed seen on this forum (not necessarily in this thread) that it was the case made that if one is truly saved the same speaks in tongues as a requirement. However I am not going to go back through all this forum and site references, (it's not that important to me). So I guess then it is hear say and thusly inadmissible. That said, I do believe that it is the implicit connotation of the original post of this thread.
I with few exception do not; speak in terms of all or none. Therefore it is not implied that I find all of those who speak in tongues to be hypocritical. There are certainly no more or less hypocritical people in either camp. Both have their fair share of hypocrites and true worshippers.
I don't know what adjectives that I used that are offensive, so I sincerely can not answer that.
I hope this clears everything up.
Paul makes it clear that those speaking in an unknown tongue are doing so through the operation of the spirit. Their spirit is conversing with God:Agree, 1 Cor is about languages, so if it does not meet the criteria for a language it is not a language.
The op of this thread does indeed imply by connotation that if one is saved he will speak in tongues.sorry. this does not work for me at all
people need...yes NEED...to stop...STOP saying those who speak in tongues believe that if you do not speak in tongues you are not saved
that has become a device used diligently by those who want to grab a hold of something to use as proof that those who speak in tongues are all wrong
I don't care about hypocrites in the camp. the tents are full.
The op of this thread does indeed imply by connotation that if one is saved he will speak in tongues.
Those that say it never say it explicitly they only say it implicitly.
And that in no way implies that everyone who speaks in tongues also believes the same thing.
And also in no way implies that you have done or said anything of the sort.