Your original post of the alleged conundrum provided the evidence. In other words, it was self-refuting.No - I was suggesting that you needed to provide evidence against my statement. However, since I just found it myself - don't worry about it...![]()
Not necessarily totally - but, we shall see...Your original post of the alleged conundrum provided the evidence. In other words, it was self-refuting.![]()
From memory, it was addressed to Moses. I'm 72, life is too short to waste time on this subject. My only aim is to help the undecided, not to change the minds of the deluded.Whatever thread that was in - please quote it and post it in that thread and "mention" me in that post. Thanks.
You obviously know little about radar. Atmospherics do affect radar, but there are ways to compensate for it. Heavy rain does affect radar, as I find when driving my car. The radar sometimes is rendered useless. However, It's not always raining at sea. We had radar in the 70's that could pick up a beer can floating in the sea.Why do you believe reflecting radar off the ionosphere would be unnecessary? You do know the atmosphere is thicker closer to the ground, right? So reflecting radar waves off the firmament over longer distances would allow increased range, due to reduced atmospheric interference?
Technically there are not 200 (for example there are a number of which are all about lighthouses -- one argument really), and some arguements by themselves don't prove it, but all together the evidence is overwhelming that modern so-called science about the earth is not the reality.TWO HUNDRED proofs the earth is not a ball.
200.
Each of which, alone, prove the earth is not what science says it is.
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=eric dubay 200 proofs&kind=video
Eric Dubay? No need to click the link... he's been soundly debunked.TWO HUNDRED proofs the earth is not a ball.
200.
Each of which, alone, prove the earth is not what science says it is.
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=eric dubay 200 proofs&kind=video
Eric Dubay? No need to click the link... he's been soundly debunked.
What is ironic is that you said this when/while you believe in a hollow earth.It's ironic that you said, "Both of you guys are "full of it", while you believe in a flat earth.
I find it very odd that you do not seem to realize that - as much as the average person thinks FE is out in left field somewhere - the same is true about HE on a few orders of magnitude.What is ironic is that you said this when/while you believe in a hollow earth.
What is ironic is that you said this when/while you believe in a hollow earth.
Hollow earth is full of hot air, flat earth simply lacks depth and ball earth merely rounds out the choices. Anyone else got any other ideas? Tin foil available upon request.
Hollow earth is full of hot air, flat earth simply lacks depth and ball earth merely rounds out the choices. Anyone else got any other ideas? Tin foil available upon request.
Fair enough - I understand.From memory, it was addressed to Moses. I'm 72, life is too short to waste time on this subject. My only aim is to help the undecided, not to change the minds of the deluded.
As you know, I don't really have a theory in this conundrum. I'm here collecting tin foil.Ball earth has the most financial backing and gives many answers to questions, although some are completely misguided. We all owe a ton of gratitude for the scientists who have worked hard to get where we are today, even though there is a ton of bad science out there as well.
Flat earth is a platform of doubt, that is really only right on some points, that disprove ball earth, but has totally failed to prove that flat earth is even possible. Not even a working model of the sun and moon for flat earthers to point to. It's really a place for the uneducated. I already posted a link that supports flat earthers have low knowledge in the science fields.
Concave Hollow Earth is the most ignored, but is the best answer. It has it's own models, proofs, and can withstand tests of stars, ships, planes, seasons, and etc.
I know when this debate ends, but it won't end soon. The mystery will be solved in time.
It’s pretty hard to believe that people believe in FE. Why not just call an airline company and ask them about geodesic? Or even easier, go visit Flightradar24 or gisgeography.com.