Ball Earth conundrums
- Thread starter GaryA
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Your original post of the alleged conundrum provided the evidence. In other words, it was self-refuting. 
-
1
- Show all
You obviously know little about radar. Atmospherics do affect radar, but there are ways to compensate for it. Heavy rain does affect radar, as I find when driving my car. The radar sometimes is rendered useless. However, It's not always raining at sea. We had radar in the 70's that could pick up a beer can floating in the sea.
Sea skimming missiles use the curvature of the earth to defeat radar. That's why airborne surveillance is a must.
Sea skimming missiles use the curvature of the earth to defeat radar. That's why airborne surveillance is a must.
-
1
- Show all
Technically there are not 200 (for example there are a number of which are all about lighthouses -- one argument really), and some arguements by themselves don't prove it, but all together the evidence is overwhelming that modern so-called science about the earth is not the reality.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Eric Dubay and David Weiss are the two leaders in the flat earth movement. Eric is more of the cult leader and David is more of the fumbling educator.
To be fair, I think it would be foolish to totally dismiss both, but to look at each point they make individually, and critique it. Just as a rough estimate maybe 50% good info, and 50% bad. The bad will probably get them discredited, but they do make a good point once in awhile is what I'm getting at.
To be fair, I think it would be foolish to totally dismiss both, but to look at each point they make individually, and critique it. Just as a rough estimate maybe 50% good info, and 50% bad. The bad will probably get them discredited, but they do make a good point once in awhile is what I'm getting at.
I find it very odd that you do not seem to realize that - as much as the average person thinks FE is out in left field somewhere - the same is true about HE on a few orders of magnitude.
I am quite sure that the absolute majority of folks would consider FE as a reality looooong before they would consider HE as a reality.
I am quite sure that the absolute majority of folks would consider FE as a reality looooong before they would consider HE as a reality.
-
1
- Show all
How so?
You have never even attempted to discredit concave hollow earth. All of sudden, you seem so sure of yourself.
I must of missed that part, where you actually backed up what you believed. Your two dimensional earth belief will be hard to live down Gary, so I would encourage you to admit you know nothing about the shape of the earth, and apologize to every one that has tried to help you, as well as your gang of misfits, who believe in a flat earth.
You can always continue on in your delusion, but at least I tried to help you.
-
1
- Show all
Ball earth has the most financial backing and gives many answers to questions, although some are completely misguided. We all owe a ton of gratitude for the scientists who have worked hard to get where we are today, even though there is a ton of bad science out there as well.
Flat earth is a platform of doubt, that is really only right on some points, that disprove ball earth, but has totally failed to prove that flat earth is even possible. Not even a working model of the sun and moon for flat earthers to point to. It's really a place for the uneducated. I already posted a link that supports flat earthers have low knowledge in the science fields.
Concave Hollow Earth is the most ignored, but is the best answer. It has it's own models, proofs, and can withstand tests of stars, ships, planes, seasons, and etc.
I know when this debate ends, but it won't end soon. The mystery will be solved in time.
-
1
- Show all
I agree, but there are people who believe in little green/gray space goblins. They have never seen them, there is no evidence of them, and yet, people still believe in them. People are gonna believe what ever they want, but if they post it in a chatroom it's up for discussion.
Can you explain how geodesic proves flat earth wrong? Also, how does Flightradar24 and gisgeography help the flat earth wrong? Can you enlighten us Susanna? I ask in honesty, not trying to set you up for a debate, or anything like that. Just curious.
Can you explain how geodesic proves flat earth wrong? Also, how does Flightradar24 and gisgeography help the flat earth wrong? Can you enlighten us Susanna? I ask in honesty, not trying to set you up for a debate, or anything like that. Just curious.
-
1
- Show all