Search results

The problem is that you're using the term "scientism" in reference to all science, both valid and falsely so-called.

Comparing the Bible to Scientism is no more valid than comparing Science to Creationism; it's a strawman argument.

My comment refers to the flat earth belief. I too say yes.

Why not?

We'll see how you defend your position when you weigh in on a serious Bible topic. FYI, there are several threads on this subject in the Conspiracy Forum. It doesn't rate a lot of attention in this forum.

Wow. Okay. Are you KJV-only as well?

Do you believe the Earth is flat? The reason it's called "water level" is because the water appears level to the human eye at most scales, and for most practical purposes, the curvature is so slight as to be irrelevant.

I've done the homework. The arithmetic is not very difficult. Your question suggests that you don't believe my assertions are valid; what is your view on these matters?

Once again, in proper English? It's not clear what you're saying here. You didn't prove anything, except perhaps that you lack understanding of the topic. There is no such word... and you still can't spell accelerating. Water might be "the perfect paradigm" but you aren't going to learn a...

Does it hurt you to run a spell check? The word is accelerating. If you did your homework, you would know that the centrifugal force on the oceans is miniscule, and that the tendency for water to "find its own level" is entirely due to gravity. Your whole argument is a strawman fallacy.

That doesn't even begin to make sense.

What a silly comment. Proper grammar allows you to communicate truth clearly. The two are not exclusive. As to your point, your mind is closed, which prevents learning.

More sick passive aggression. Your moniker is hypocritical.

Communism is inherently anti-biblical; capitalism is not.

Yet you have argued with me when I disagree with you, spewing unpleasant adjectives my way, and when I disagreed with SoberXP, you tell him to ignore the hate. Meanwhile you continue to make reference to your (erroneous) beliefs about me in a post to him. That's passive-aggressive behaviour...

Instead of reading my posts to understand, you have read them only to refute. In doing so, you are tilting at windmills, and arguing against nothing but wind. Read my posts again, slowly, without prejudice.

You haven't come right out and said so, but you have implied strongly that (according to you) Jesus is not God. That is contrary to Scripture, in which it is made abundantly clear that Jesus IS God.

Edit... Humans become what Jesus is...

I'm not going to respond to your posts if you persist in your blind arrogance.

Do you think that I am unaware of these verses? Do you think that the Holy Spirit speaks through you to me, but not through me to you? Do you see how incredibly arrogant that is?