Search results

In your view, is disagreement the same as hate?

Um, yes, destroy does mean kill. God killed the wicked of Sodom and Gomorrah. God killed Pharaoh and the Egyptian army. God killed the 185,000 of Sennacherib's army. What God "can" do is not the issue; the Bible tells us what God has done and what God will do.

We don't become angels. They are a separate class of creation. Humans become when Jesus is post-resurrection: human, but incorruptible.

(Sigh)... You just don't get it. I'll put it in elementary terms so that (hopefully) you can see your error. A husband and wife are like two halves of a whole. Jesus and His bride are, in the same way, like two halves of a whole. Continuing with the "picture" of marriage, Jew and Gentile...

Dude, you ain't the Holy Spirit.

That doesn't even begin to make sense. What I wrote is plain biblical truth that proves your statements wrong. Humans don't become angels, and this line of discussion is irrelevant to the thread topic.

Don't put words in my mouth. The present situation is not God's design, but neither is human-enforced redistribution. You like the idea of communism where all are equal, but you overlook (or are completely unaware) of the fact that in every communist system, "some are more equal than others".

Proper grammar is great. Unfortunately, neither of your statements employs it. Here are a few examples with correct grammar: Of whom is Elohim speaking? To whom is Elohim speaking? Who is speaking to whom? "Too" means "also". "To" means "in the direction of".

That is not what the Bible says! Before the flood, God said that He regretted making mankind (Genesis 5:6). After the flood, God said that He would not destroy it again by water (Genesis 9:11). Nowhere does God say that He will not appear to kill the wicked. Quite the contrary! He promises...

No, it says that the members of the early Church in Jerusalem shared (past tense) all things. It says nothing about them living together, but rather about meeting together. It was voluntary, not mandatory, and there is no mention anywhere in Scripture of that being an ideal, desired, or...

In light of the rest of your post, you should ask that question of yourself. True, and talking about Jew and Gentile, not husband and wife. Not a directive at all. From a completely different context, and a directive statement rather than a statement of truth. Wrong. Man is completely...

I knew you couldn't make your case without accusing me of inferior morality. What you don't see is that your comments only reflect on you.

It's not a matter of perspective, but of proper grammar. "Who" was there at the beginning, not "Whom".

I'm sure that sounded profound to you when you wrote it. For me, it adds nothing to the conversation. It's not clear whether you mean "too" (also) or "to" (towards). If the latter, then "who" should be "whom". Perhaps if you worded your sentence properly, your meaning would be clear(er).

Um... while your implied conclusion is valid, the path by which you got there definitely isn't. You took Jesus' words about marriage and are attempting to imply a correlation to Jews and Gentiles. Nothing in Scripture suggests that Jews marry Gentiles to become the body of Christ.

Where do you see the Son in this passage? Overtly, not anachronistically from John 1. Respectfully, that's a stretch. Tell me something: Given that, most likely, each member of the Trinity instantly knows what the others are thinking, why would they have to speak to one another like this...

I don't doubt this is a revelation to you, but that revelation is not coming across. Perhaps you could further unpack what you're saying?

Perhaps because predestination absolves them of responsibility.

You really can't accept that the KJV is wrong on this, can you?

Really? Trying to discredit me on the basis of your morals? Don't waste my time with such tripe. The difference is simple: one is merely the word of man, while the other is the transcendent word of God. Talk to God about that. Pharaoh hardened his own heart first. There is no hint of anything...