Search results

Or perhaps … ‘I was honoured to be dinner for a son of Adam.’ Or maybe I just need to stop climbing through the spare room furniture. 😎

Please note the threads and post numbers (or at least page numbers) where you have posted these alleged proofs. I would like to examine them.

That verse is referring to spiritual entities (demons), not physical things.

I did not, though I know that both are omnivores.

I recently visited the Ark Encounter in Kentucky, an extension of the ministry Answers in Genesis, where I found rational answers to your concerns. Please stop assuming that fellow Christians are lying; these matters are not "illogical" at all. Many people (yourself included, apparently) assume...

I give this guy three days (maximum) before he's booted. In the meantime, what do you guys like on/with your popcorn?

Um, what? The fruit of the Spirit are love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. What, exactly, do you mean, when you claim these are not supernatural fruit?

@HeIsHere: You have revealed your hand. You have no integrity when you applaud Neh6 for his insults and give me the glum face for calling him on it. The same judgement is given those applauding wrongdoing as those committing it (see Romans 1:32).

Because many people don't know the facts. And before Neh6 charges me with the old, "Yeah, hath God really said" hogwash, that is only rebellious when one actually knows what God said and challenges it. When the original message is uncertain and requires study to tease out, it is a perfectly...

"Unicorn" in the KJV likely refers to the animal we know today as the rhino... Linnean name "Rhinoceros unicornis". ;)

Unless, as I stated, those words don’t appear in the original text. Then the manuscripts with the words are the corrupted versions, EVEN IF those added words ‘glorify Christ’.

I'm left with only one nagging question: WHY must we fight Voddie Baucham? ;)

If many of the “Christ-glorifying” words don’t exist in the original text, the translation cannot be “more accurate”. ;)

You insult me? Bring it on. You will be judged… and your words will only reflect on you.

A new covenant between the same parties may make the old covenant obsolete, but not necessarily. The terms and context of the covenant would determine that. In other words, the title question contains insufficient information for us to provide a clear answer.

And throws the accusation at others while doing so.

I can't believe I have to explain this AGAIN (well, I don't, but I'm going to only to prove you are off the baseline). Post 828 was made in reference to Zandar's post 823 which (in diagram form) asked how Venus would be visible given its smaller orbit radius, in turn made in response to Gary's...

And so, a thread about the importance of proper biblical interpretation methods has become a battleground over the KJV… again. I’m so surprised. Well, not really….

Perhaps you could choose much shorter thread titles in future. There is no need for a paragraph.

. They are and always were distinct posts, made in response to two different people. Deal with it.