Search results

Okay... so is the incarnation pagan? Are the crucifixion and resurrection pagan? What, precisely, do you think Christians are celebrating during "Christmas" and "Easter"?

Hi... A direct question for you: Is English a second language for you? It appears to be, and that could mean you're trying to say things that don't quite make sense to native English speakers. No shame in that, but it would help if everyone knows you're struggling a bit to communicate.

Either the word "of" between "word" and "God" doesn't belong, or your claim contradicts both the Bible and the Quran. While it's true that linguistically, the words "god" and "allah" are synonyms, in either a Christian or a Moslem context, they are not used of the same entity, and should not...

Did you miss a word there?

And those who were never under the authority of the RCC need not worry, because it is impossible to "rebel" against an authority that you aren't "under".

Since the God of the Bible and Allah of the Quran are not the same being, abandoning their teachings is not the same thing. The Bible is the written word from the Creator of the entire universe in which we live. The Quran, at best, is the writings of a mystic influenced by a variety of religious...

Whether the curvature is visible (from anywhere on Earth) is nothing but a side issue. There are many other observations available that do not allow for the Flat Earth model. If you were repeatedly claiming, "I don't see the curvature", then I wouldn't have an issue with it, because that is a...

You might have thought it but certainly didn't say it... not even "basically".

Proof only exists in mathematics. In every other field, the best you can hope for is evidence. One person's "proof" is only what that person found convincing, not what should necessarily convince anyone else. The nature of proof is not a matter that the Bible addresses, so expecting biblical...

You completely missed my point. I didn't say you contradicted yourself. Read more carefully. You provided the evidence that has convinced you. It doesn't convince me. Like I said, this is a dead horse issue.

To the first part, yes, absolutely. Only the originals were inspired. You simply have a wrong concept of textual criticism. The purpose is, by examining all manuscript evidence, to determine what is the original text. It's not about deciding what is an error.

No, you're repeating your perception. Unfortunately, you exemplify the blind man with the elephant.

"Government assistance"

If your aim is to "find the truth", why do you keep arguing on behalf of the RCC? You've become just another person with a contradictory opinion.

Um… you’re incorrect as well. "Begging the question fallacy is a logical fallacy in which an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion. It is also known as petitio principii or circular reasoning. This fallacy occurs when an argument’s premise depends on or is equivalent to the...

What you consider ‘proof’ for your claims isn’t proof anyway, so why bother?

Quote any person who says this.

Really...? So where is this "creed" documented? I'm sure since you are so certain, you have several sources at hand. And why are you YELLING?

That's three languages, not one. ;) I'm not arguing the fact that God has preserved His word (like your snarky and inappropriate comment implies). I'm arguing the fact that Psalm 12 does not support the idea.

And wasn't self-righteous about it.