Search results

You're right, the KJV does not claim inspiration, but there are many KJV-only proponents who believe it was reinspired.

"Fornication" is a transliteration. There is nothing wrong with replacing a made-up word with a thought-for-thought translation. The removal of 1 John 5:7 has everything to do with evidence and nothing to do with agenda. As for "wha (sic) I desire to see", once again, you don't know jack about...

Here's a perfect example:

That's foolish reasoning. God cursed the ground and the serpent, and He declared unpleasant consequences on the man and the woman, so you must think that a woman pleasing her husband is an unpleasant consequence. No, the KJV is not correct on this.

Fallacious, mysogynistic, despicable, and wrong, all in one. Golf clap.

Are the texts discussing the same man and the same event? Yes. Do they contradict each other? Yes. It's still an error. Obviously the KJV is not "reinspired".

I'm not going hunting back through years of posts to find an example of your hypocrisy.

Read that statement to yourself about ten or fifteen times.

Stephanus is based on Erasmus, who collated from several different sources. Surely you've done your homework enough to know this.

Here's one case: 2 Kings 8:26 Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel. Compared with 2 Chronicles 22:2 Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to...

Yes, God does indeed have that authority. And? What God can do is not the issue here.

True. I’m not opposed to that.

Streeeeetch. Nothing like cutting and pasting Scripture to support a belief system.

A link to a book is NOT evidence.

So produce the evidence.

It's completely bereft of proof, because proof requires evidence, and there is none. Fear-mongering bleating without evidence. Show the EVIDENCE of people believing different doctrines based on reading modern translations. You can bleat all you like. The evidence is never produced...

I don't see anyone getting angry in response the KJV-only claims. What I do see is those who don't hold to KJV-only calmly dismantling the stupid arguments set forth. The rancor is usually from the KJV-only proponents as they spew silly warnings of doom. The Bible is the treasure chest; the...

Nobody is arguing "different doctrines" here. It's just a bunch of KJV-only proponents bleating that other translations cause people to believe different doctrines... with no actual proof whatsoever.

And so you need to find an unblemished goat, go to the temple in Jerusalem, find a priest and have them sacrifice it on your behalf. You really don't get it. Either you follow the ENTIRE Mosaic Law (as it applies to you) or you don't, and you need to repent for not doing so. The problem is that...