Search results

Don’t take offense, but why do a hit’ run post? If you believe I’m wrong, certainly give a reason for that. If not, why even bother posting in the first place?

How did I miss the point of the whole chapter? You’re assuming that I did based on what per say?

I think Jesus was pretty clear when He was speaking to the Church of Laodicea.

I would have to adhere that when Jesus states “In Him” he is alluring to the fact that one would have to remain in Him for the sake of salvation. Without Christ there is no Church.

Yes, I understand that. My question was see where the other users position was.

So are saying Paul received a different Gospel when he was in Arabia?

What does my trust in Jesus have to do with the topic?

Nor any other creature would allude to something external. I’m having difficulty understanding you. Are saying that Jesus words were nullified once the Church was established? Was His teachings words only for the Jews? Please give clarification.

The best answers you will get is by reading scripture and by prayer. You will get a lot of opinions from people, but what does scripture actually say? Also one has to take into account your sincerity of the question. Are really looking for an answer? If yes, that has made plain.

Paul’s is speaking of external things that can’t separate. He doesn’t mention ourselves. Tell me how you would interpret this passage: 15 “I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. 2 He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he...

Let’s just stay with what Jesus said for now. All of the verses I used I came from Him.

We are in complete agreement about what scripture says. What I like to discuss is the notion of one giving up salvation. Saying “Well that was meant for the Jews” is not a way to address those passages. If we only accept what we agree with and reject other things, we are not really living in the...

So which things of Jesus’s teaching should we as Gentiles accept and not accepted according to this?

There are Heretics all over. They adhere to what I call the “Play-Dough God”. They want to mold God into a representation of their beliefs instead of who God claims He is and what He has done.

Jesus became sin. Hence why the Father could not look upon Him.

The book of Revelation has been debated and analyzed probably more than any other scripture due to its eschatology. Some Christians view it as allegorical while others view it as literal. I fall somewhere in between. With regards to the Millennial Kingdom, I fall on the side of literal. It’s...

Yes, of course that is part of it, but I didn’t want to stray from the topic of the OP. So if those verses I used for this were for the Jews, why would think anything Jesus said or did would be given over to the Gentiles?

Accepting Jesus and Lord as Savior. So if this was for only the Jews, shouldn’t we assume that Jesus entire ministry was only for the Jews?

If Jesus wasn’t speaking to His followers whom were those words meant for?

What if that person chooses not to repent?