Search results

I'll have to defend Tucker here. He's more of the President's gadfly. He's criticized Trump on multiple occasions, including the video Kalyagirl posted. I know a few Trump supporters who are totally done with him.

Equally important is what isn't seen when the camera flips out of focus. A lot can happen within a second that alters what we will make of this fact pattern. That's plain. Why did he decide to charge the man? Also plain, but again we have to ask the question why. Nope, it's a possibility...

The camera drifts out of focus in what is arguably the most important point. It doesn't give us a clear record of what was said either. If shotgun man pointed at him saying "you're dead meat," well then you have a valid case of somebody defending themselves. This very well could have happened...

My man! It's a great one! The chorus is just too fitting for this thread.

I really do worry we'll end up a totalitarian Leftist state or a Right-Wing autocracy. The Rightists people should be worried about are not morons on the street, however few, but the people who relish the idea of quelling these riots with mass violence. The Constitutional Republic so many...

Tucker did a great job as always. A real gadfly.

I jumped down that rabbit hole. The source of his link is BET. BET sourced Vice News a vice news article. Now BET and Vice both do us a service of pointing out how rioting and looting is being done by people of both races. The question is why- BET references Vice in saying it's Far-Right...

The TMZ clip is insufficient evidence of this. The armed man could have been attacking him before film rolled.

The TMZ clip is too late for anybody to say whether the kill was justified. Both parties did not act with wisdom.

We could live beside the ocean Leave the fire behind Swim outside the breakers Watch the world die -Everclear, "Santa Monica"

Between this and the church closings, I'm waiting for Governor Beshear to change his wardrobe to drab military-chic.

I happen to agree, but that doesn't address my question.

Does her comparison need to be perfectly equivalent to carry her point about injustice?

Well for point one, it appears to be a report. Feel free to verify the facts through other reports. I trust Mac Donald enough not to. The second paragraph relies on Bureau of Justice Statistics.

History also teaches that torching a Wendy's is an ineffective way to establish justice. Now, appealing to a lesser magistrate to break ties with Britain, levy a competent army, and secure alliances and loans from foreign powers. Yes.

Interesting way to ask the question. I would like to see where you are going with it. She's more liberal on gay marriage and abortion.

That's precisely the point. Police brutality spans the most prevalent racial groups in the United States (Black, White, and Latino). The problem is not one of particular "Social Justice", but of government growth and social atomization. If families and, subsequently, communities deteriorate...

This is, by far, the best article I've read on the rash of riots. I don't think it goes far enough in explaining why it is an international phenomenon. Heather Mac Donald is one of the sharpest minds around. If only she came to her senses on the social issues.

Alex Jones and 4Chan were more correct about Jeffrey Epstein than the news media. I'm not saying this to confer automatic credence to Alex Jones and 4Chain- far from it. Simply saying that the internet is just about as viable a vector for truth than "respectable" institutions such as the...

As they used to say- the issue is not the issue. Revolution is the issue.