Search results

Hire a food tester. ;)

I encourage you to stop wasting your time with Catholic practices. Instead, simply talk to the Lord and read the Bible.

No worries. It's in Matthew 5:17.-18: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means...

Indeed He did. What else did He say, in that brief statement?

Greetings! Nice to see you back/around still! Even in a "public" setting, it would only be appropriate for a man to greet such a woman or have a brief conversation with her, but that's about it. A wise Christian man would not allow himself to be in any private setting with such a woman, nor to...

Here's the clarification, with the implied context made overt: The Law, as given to and through Moses on Mt. Sinai to the ancient Israelites, is not binding on Christians.

The alleged "removal" of doctrines is not "false teaching". Noting that a verse does not appear in a particular translation is not anywhere close to proving that the doctrine has been "removed". First, you need to establish that the verse in question belongs, and it is a fallacy to use the KJV...

No, you asked, "So what about the Law of Christ?" I ask you, so what about it? Perhaps you'd like to add some more words to your question.

That isn't the "Law" to which I referred. Context makes that abundantly clear.

Don't be ridiculous. Nobody is recommending such intentional corruptions of Scripture as worthwhile.

The Catholics were off in left field before the KJV existed and long before Westcott and Hort. There have been spiritists through the ages too. As for Unitarians, I wouldn't even count them as pseudo-Christian. Great claims require great evidence. Don't bother with the accusations unless you...

You can quote it, but you don't appear to understand it. Scripture does not say that Paul kept every sabbath decades after the cross. Acts 13 mentions him being in the synagogues a few successive sabbaths, and Acts 18 is specific to Corinth. Typical legalistic misrepresentation of freedom in...

Agreed. The Law is not binding on Christians.

No Bible "teaches" false doctrine. People teach false doctrines. What you keep avoiding is that people have used the KJV to teach false doctrines no less than people have used other translations.

Psalm 12:6 is not about "a perfect or pure Word being preserved today". Neither is Proverbs 30:5, nor 1 Peter 1:23, nor 1 Peter 2:2.

Shhh… don’t reveal the secrets!

To whom did Jesus teach these things? Gentiles, or Jews? Was the new covenant in His blood in place at that time?

Your argument sounds valid if one only considers the Ten Commandments. Once you take into account the other 603 ordinances, the untenability of your claim comes to light. :)

You’re still carefully ignoring the cults.

You’re right… it doesn’t make sense that you ignore the largest pseudo-Christian cults that all started with the KJV.