Search results

Whining and lying aren't the marks of a mature believer in Christ. Firstly, you aren't being attacked at all, and certainly not "for believing the promises of God...". Don't be ridiculous! You stuck your head in here to defend the KJV, and have made claims about it. Your claims are merely...

There are times when you just don't get it. Westcott and Hort happened almost 200 years ago, dude! That's hardly "new". The Bishop's and Geneva were about 50 years old and Tyndale almost 100 when the KJV was first released. It was "the new kid on the block" back then. In other words, your...

A Gnomonic-projection map of the Earth does not a flat earth prove. Of course, I don’t expect you to understand that. I might hope, however, that you learn.

Please define “level” as used above.

Inane and insulting comments won’t convince anyone of anything… other than that you would rather insult others than examine your own position.

Yes, it is. You changed the subject, which was your assertion, “You guys are the new kids on the block.” Now, because you know you have no response, you are talking about the influence of various translations.

More ignorant stupidity. These photos were taken from a point North of the Arctic Circle near the winter solstice, when the sun does not set. You are being foolish by posting them and implying or claiming that they support a flat Earth position.

It is hypocritical to claim this when you reject the evidence pointing to errors in the KJV. You are incapable of knowing truth when you reject the possibility of truth.

You mean… like rejecting the plain conclusion that one of the texts on Ahaziah’s age is simply wrong? That is the common sense, logical conclusion that involves facts. Every KJV-onlyist “explanation” rejects the plain text.

None of which says anything about it being the perfect translation. It’s all circumstantial and irrelevant.

Fallacy: circular reasoning. You cannot use the statements about Ahaziah’s age as evidence to explain the contradiction between them. Your theory is grasping at the wind.

More fallacious personification. People may have taught false doctrines while primarily using these manuscripts, but I doubt it. People have certainly used the KJV to teach false doctrines.

Fallacy: moving the goalposts.

A foolish and ignorant argument. The KJV was the new kid on the block in 1611, as against the Geneva and Bishop’s Bibles (~50 years old then), and Tyndale (~90 years)… and the granddaddy Vulgate (~1400 years). Stop using dumb, easily-refuted arguments and your position will seem less ridiculous.

No. Jesus lived and died on this planet “once for all” … for all humankind. Were there “other earths”, He would have to have suffered and died many times.

That water finds its own level is true on a small scale. The principle applies on a large scale, but the cause of the phenomenon must be determined. It’s called “gravity”. That same gravity holds water to a level (where other forces don’t override it). Once you are rightly considering gravity...

You’re not wrong. Some of us may remember the old Kung Fu TV show… there was an enemy clan of assassins known as the Tong.

No. He, and I, and others, are saying that the KJV translation of God’s word has errors in it. There is a massive difference. Oooh … “Bible corrector”. Do you really think that name-calling has any place in a debate about the Bible? Do you think that throwing stones will convince anyone of...

“Differences”? “Bent on seeing error”? I see you would rather diminish the issue and throw shade than admit either that you were wrong or that the KJV has errors.

Wow... what a complete misattribution! God did nothing of the sort. Anti-theistic "scientists" invented long ages to allow time for evolution, deposition, and erosion. They used unprovable hypotheses to "confirm" their findings. They date the rocks by the fossils in them, and the fossils by the...