Search results

If God’s Word is “incorruptible” and “cannot be broken”, then humans can’t corrupt it. ;)

Where it instructs us to do, yes. We aren’t expected to walk on water. ;)

Ad hominem attacks are literally “to the man”. I haven’t attacked you personally other than calling you the hypocrite you are. I can criticize your ideas all day long but that’s not ad hominem. As for showing evidence, I will only do that with claims I have made… not with what you think.

It isn't, at least no more than the KJV. Utter bullhockey. The very nature of absolute truth is what drives the search for the original wording. Right back atcha. Again you misrepresent reality. The reality is more like two houses with identical foundations, structure, quality of building...

There is no such thing as a "Bible line". You've been brainwashed by the KJV-only propaganda.

Again you misrepresent the reason why people disagree with you. Self-delusion at its best.

So "warm and fuzzy" is the standard? Sounds like a padded room to me.

Hypocritical yet again. You deride the "authority" of scholars while holding to a work translated by... scholars.

You are the one with the axe to grind. Posthuman is a long-time well-respected member of this forum, and his contributions are marked by an absence of hostility. He's just pointing out the inconsistency of your position. Methinks you can't handle your inconsistencies (yes, plural) being pointed...

When you can’t distinguish between criticism and “attack”, you’re acting like the leftists do. Yup… sidestep into making an “attack” before you have even heard the criticism. Proverbs 18:3 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is a folly and shame unto him. Fallacious...

I don’t understand the question. 🤔 ;)

… or frittering their time away arguing about which donut tastes best. ;)

Oh My. Goodness. You're still trying to change the subject. D'oh!

Says the guy who wiggles out of "what God said" in 2 Kings 8:26 and 2 Chronicles 22:2. Hypocrite.

Did Isaiah have all the words of God? Did David? How about Moses? Abraham? Noah? How about Hezekiah, or Huldah, or Hannah? None of them did, yet they were faithful to what little they did have. That puts them in a different category than you, who claim to have all the words of God but don't...

None of that is relevant to the topic at hand. You made the accusation that the modern Bibles are the new kids on the block, as though that is some terrible thing. I countered that the KJV was once the new kid. Instead of acknowledging that and retracting your accusatory remark, you have...

You do understand that your definition works perfectly well on a hypothetical flat earth as well as on the real near-spherical Earth? Mind you, given that altitude is the vertical distance from mean sea level, you're basically employing circular reasoning. ;)

Just because scientists can't explain to your satisfaction what gravity is doesn't mean they don't know. Gravity adequately explains the pressure differential related to distance from the Earth's centre. Or, instead of complaining that (your understanding of) physics doesn't explain real-world...

It does seem that way sometimes. :cautious:

I know quite well what an agnostic is, thanks, and "Bible agnostic" is yet another in a long line of insults you have thrown at me. That is inconsistent with your claim to care for me. You think that because I reject the idea that the KJV is perfect that I believe all sorts of other things...