Search results

Agreed. Thankfully, God is merciful and gracious. He wants even flat Earthers to come to repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth. 😎

The human eye is incapable of detecting the difference in ”level” of water over small distances (up to a few miles). You are making claims beyond your capacity to know. When you feel curious, do some research on the towers of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge in New York. You might be surprised.

If you are going to treat this passage as a "command", at least start where the passage starts: 21 Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.

You use big words without understanding what they mean when put together. It's clear to me that your capacity for comprehension is far exceeded by your delusion.

Yet you don't use the same standard for the KJV that you use for other translations. Again, hypocrisy.

Um, no, the KJV does not tell you to trust the KJV. If it did, it would have been put out to the pasture of heresy centuries ago. Ridiculous. Do you really think Jesus said "farthing"? Again your hyprocrisy shines brightly.

I don't follow a "movement"; I follow Jesus Christ. You should too. You might want to check the dictionary next time, before using words unfamiliar to you.

Either God's word is incorruptible, or it is not. There is no such thing as an "incorruptible line of His Word". That's a fantasy you made up to defend your previous statement. It is incoherent to claim that God's word is incorruptible while claiming that it has been corrupted. The two simply...

Faith has nothing to do with it (again you are sidestepping). Faith is certainty in things not seen, not pretend-certainty in what you hold in your hands. You pretend to be logical, but the moment you have to deal with an error in the KJV, suddenly you set aside your "perfection" and hold to...

Try convincing a Jew of that.

Your response reminds me of Justin Trudeau and his Liberal cronies in the Canadian parliament. You, like they, seem incapable of responding to any challenge or criticism without sidestepping it and throwing shade on your favourite scapegoats.

Again, you are being hypocritical. You prefer the 1900 version of the KJV, but pretend that it's identical to the 1611 when complaining about "modern" versions. Your preferred version has been through several revisions and is actually younger than some of those you decry. Yours is a...

I didn’t “dismiss” anything. I said your statement is incoherent. Wrong and misleading. “Removed” is completely the wrong concept here. One can only “remove” something that was present. The words, phrases and verses that appear in the KJV but not in “modern translations” have been examined and...

As doctrine does not exist outside of exegesis and interpretation, your assertion is incoherent. There may be quite a few differences in wording between the KJV and a particular modern translation, but given that few modern versions are actually modified KJV translations, they aren’t...

No, I don’t think that”s in the wrong thread. ;)

You keep slandering Westcott and Hort despite the fact that nobody has stood up for them.

Gnats in your food make it imperfect, unsuitable for eating. Wrong words in the KJV make it imperfect, unsuitable for trusting.

Scripture, not “KJV”, and yes, I would, if someone told me the gospel.

Indeed… which is a great reason to use a modern translation instead of the KJV.

Let’s put that heresy to rest right now. The KJV IS NOT the foundation of the faith. The atoning death and resurrection of Jesus Christ are the foundation of the Christian faith. Period!