Search results

Assuming reports of what's in it are not being exaggerated, I'll probably skip it.

alright then, from what I hear most of the fun is watching the freaks that show up make fools of themselves anyway. Though I admit I'd be curious if the content could possibly find a way to be worse than the Elves(1989), unlikely.

yeah I've heard it, on the other hand some people say it's not really that bad and was more or less making fun of them(like a mel brooks parody), I'm basically asking if anyone who's seen it can confirm or deny.

I've got an oportunity to go see the rocky picture horror show, has anyone actually seen this, being into trashy cult films this is one Ive thought about watching. However from what I hear from some people is that aside from being a drag show, it's riddled with innuendoes and nudity. Is it like...

thanks for the replies everyone. I feel now I'm not completely off my rocker on my view on this matter. A woman wearing boxers for comfort, or a man wearing heels for a fashion statement, or a man who wears a skirt to keep cool was probably not the focus of deuteronomy 22 5.

yes that's kind of my view on the matter as well, then there's the whole philosophical matter of whether they were saved to begin with, but thats another discussion, There a verse I remeber hearing but have no idea where in the old testament, something about a lamp while it is still burning...

even though it doesn't say salvation or hell? the description after says received a blessing, and the other is close to being cursed, in other words not actually cursed. Also the author did just say previously we weren't going to build the foundation again, he's essentially saying that's not the...

it's the will of laundru.

your fine, the description after is rather telling, trampling under the son of god and profaning, is not describing someone who has simply screwed up.

I was just curious, I meant me specifically on the subject we touched on previously?

Why are you replying to this again?

okay, for awhile there you made it sound really extreme, we all stumble in various ways, but we still have to at the very minimum try to deal with sin as we go.

actually I was trying to better understand the posters position on the matter.

Question just for clarity, since we'd have to know we sinned to repent and confess, then in your view is willful sin repent-able and forgivable? Does that mean if you don't know you sinned, it's automatically covered under Christ? I'm still trying to wrap my head around the verse about...

those were johns words, not mine, I'm still not sure what your getting at with willful sin though, I can sort see the logic of sin you didnt know about, but paul seems to differ and gives an interesting view. 14So the trouble is not with the law, for it is spiritual and good. The trouble is...

If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.

how much does it really matter if you believe first or obey first if we need both? Isnt the decision to believe a small act of obdience in itself?

given how the chapter leads up to that point, I think it's basically saying you won't have one without the other.

for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus how far do we take this chicken vs the egg argument?

first, those are laws for the jews to follow, yes willful sin is more serious, but they are treated the same at judgement, and souls in those verses, just for clarity means person.