Search results

  1. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    I believe in a historicist interpretation of biblical prophesy. i believe biblical prophesy is too obscure to interpret on its own. biblical prophesy is a testimony that must be matched with the historical record, which is another form of witness. only together can prophesy be understood. they...
  2. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    Book of Daniel written before 500 BC. Just focusing on correct interpretation of 4th beast. I will make next entry tomorrow.
  3. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    There interpretations on 1st, 2nd and 3rd beast are spot on, but their interpretation of the 4th beast is lacking. They make no attempt to match the 10 horns with the historical record of the roman empire. They make no attempt to match the 3 uprooted horns with the historical...
  4. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    Great, we are on the same page. Notice with the 1st, 2nd and 3rd beasts they used the historicist method. They are only able to interpret these visions by matching up the features of each beast with the historical record of the corresponding empire. They do a great job in correctly...
  5. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    OK, so now I have a new source in which to test. Thanks. Now today a popular "end times" view is to be a "premillenial dispensationalist". But I am guessing that is not in the Geneva Bible? Can you refer me to some verses?
  6. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    Oh the notes are right there in the bible? Is this a good source? https://www.reformedreader.org/gbn/en.htm
  7. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    But how do I look up Geneva Bible Notes?
  8. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    Where did you quote their notes?
  9. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    OK, I looked up Geneva Bible. It is very similar to the King James Bible. What does this have to do with interpreting who or what the 4th beast of Daniel 7 is ? I propose the 4th beast in Daniel 7 is the Roman Republic. The 10 horns are the Tribune of the Plebs...
  10. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    Your views on this matter align with the interpretation of Daniel 7 from "gotquestions.org". Please read their entire interpretation of Daniel 7. Visit link below: https://www.gotquestions.org/Daniel-four-beasts.html Let me know when you have read it completely, then perhaps we can go from...
  11. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    This is your thought process You perform a detailed half-baked analysis of Daniel 7 and so here is what you have done. NO Abstract NO Introduction NO Method NO Results NO Discussion YES Conclusion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO Reference List
  12. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    There is no sound approach in your thinking. 1) you admit you don't know what the first 4 beasts are 2) but then you don't bother to make any attempt to understand what the first 4 beasts are. 3)You simply skip right over Daniel 7:1-25 without any understanding or effort and jump to Daniel...
  13. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    I would make the case for the fourth beast to be Roman Republic and the little horn is the rise of the emperor. I would do this by matching to historical record.
  14. Nebuchadnezzer

    The absurdity and heresy of Preterism

    What about the historicist approach to interpreting prophesy, what do you think about this approach?
  15. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    So what about the 4th beast being the Roman Republic which then transitions into the Roman Empire, what do you think of this?
  16. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    Forget revelation for now. let us not go in circles and focus just on daniel 7. Do you have opinion on any of the beasts of Daniel?
  17. Nebuchadnezzer

    The absurdity and heresy of Preterism

    Preterism is no less absurd than futurism. Both doctrines were created by the middle ages Catholic Church in attempt to hide and to deny that the office of pope is the anti-christ. You attack Preterism, which is one of the doctrines of the Catholic Church, but then you espouse Futurism...
  18. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    This is getting all over the place now, and I can see you are locked in to your interpretation of Daniel 9:27. The only way forward with this discussion between us is backwards to Daniel 7. My understanding is that most evangelicals agree with this assessment of the four beasts of Daniel 7 at...
  19. Nebuchadnezzer

    Prophecy, it’s not what most think.

    Why are you on this forum? Is it not to share you views which you believe are correct? And here I am practically begging you to share your views with me and you either refuse, or you opt to give me a curt response. I have never heard about this Geneva Bible before or the views which...
  20. Nebuchadnezzer

    Catholicism vs Protestantism

    England was under the Roman Catholic Church, but so was most of Europe. Also, the beast had two horns, which signified the east/west schism of 1054 AD. The eastern (Greek) catholic church also covered Russia, Asia minor, Syria, Egypt... in other words "the whole world". Prostitute of Babylon...