Search results

Yes I agree with what you are saying in that the 1st and 2nd temples were literal temples which foreshadowed the spiritual temple that Paul wrote about in Ephesians. Jesus being the chief cornerstone, is clearly metaphorical. But Paul also wrote about another temple in 2 Thessalonians 2...

This is all correct, that the Roman Pontiff is the anti-Christ. But then this would have to mean that the temple of God which Paul talked about in 2 Thessalonians 2 would have to be the Vatican, or more precisely Old St. Peters Basilica (until it was replaced by St. Peter Basilica). So this...

Why make an an argument you can't prove or win? Whether it is true or not the Roman Church does have a claim to Peter's grave being under St. Peters Basilica. If you do your homework the Old St. Peter's Basilica was a temple and a shrine to Peter. They have made Peter as their god. But you...

Most of the Roman Church's documents (and there are many, many documents) are written as legal and binding contracts for all persons. There are a myriad of decrees made and beliefs stated in their documents (contracts). The Roman Church condemns, rejects and anathematises anyone who fails to...

But there is also mention that the city of Jerusalem would be destroyed and also the sanctuary. Did not the Romans do this? The chief priests chose the anti-christ as their king. John 19:14-15 “Here is your king [Jesus],” Pilate said to the Jews. But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him...

But what about the ending of sacrifices, the destruction of the city and the temple? That is mentioned in Daniel 9. The anti-christ is the roman emperors that bring about these things.

Here is my definition and understanding of the historicist approach: Biblical prophesy can only be correctly understood after it has been fulfilled, and after it has been correctly matched to the historical record. Miller's stance on things like the anti-christ may have been based on the...

I understand this, but there is a gap between the end of the 69th week and the start of the 70th week. If not then what happened from 27 AD through 34AD?

Perhaps you ought to sit down with a lawyer when you read it. First Vatican Council says, " the apostolic see and the Roman pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that the Roman pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter, the prince of the apostles, He you go. In black and white (actually...

I believe I have a fuller understanding now. The Archbishop of Canterbury is a false prophet who is under the authority of the Roman Pontiff. So Roman Pontiff alone is the Man of Lawlessness.

Exactly, this world that Satan rules over has hundreds and hundreds of christian denominations, but in the end there are only two choices for all: 1) you belong to the Man of No Sin - Jesus Christ of Nazareth OR 2) you belong to the Man of Sin - the Roman Pontiff. I have been saved by Jesus...

This is all deception you are spewing. Most people on this site recognize there is something fraudulent with the Roman Catholic Church. In First Vatican Council they clearly call themselves the "Roman church". It is also clear in your above post you try to make excuses and cover for this...

That is not the catholic position! Whoever told you this is deceiving you. Please, read carefully for yourself at least once the: Decrees of the First Vatican Council SESSION 4 : 18 July 1870 https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum20.htm

1) The Roman emperor Justinian formulated the Holy Sees (Pentarchy) in his laws. 2) The Roman emperors (Contantine and Theodosius I) called for the two ecumenical councils that established the Nicene and Nice Constantinople Creed. Both the Holy Sees and the Nicene Creed were created under...

You have allowed Miller (7th day adventists) and the Jehovahs to influence your thinking. There erroneous interpretations have succeeded in pushing you away from the historicist interpretation, which is the correct approach. The problem is that Miller turned his historicist approach into a...

70th week happend 66 to 73 AD. I thought there was a gap. The guy who posted this thread is saying Jesus crucified around 27-30 AD But the roman-jewish war that ended sacrifices, destroyed the sanctuary and was the beginnings of desolations did not happen until 66 to 73 AD. So there is a...

Do you understand all what is declared from the Holy Sees? No you do not! if you do not then don't cite the Nicene Creed. Because you are pledging allegience to the hierarchy of the Holy Sees . Nicene Creed is man written. It does not say "one church", it says "one, holy catholic and...

none of these churches have ever fully broken with the roman catholic church RCC. all of them have come back or are mving back to the roman catholic church RCC. the orthodox and anglican churches both have an imperfect communion with the RCC. the others are moving back toward dialogue and...

This PROVES my POINT!!!!!!!! Anyone who cites the Nicene Creed is pledging allegiance to the Holy Catholic and Apostolic [Roman] Church. They of course leave out the Roman to deceive, but as seen in the above context Roman is clearly inferred but omitted from the Nicene Creed. Deceitful as...

Yes. 1 John 2:21-23 I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it and because no lie comes from the truth. Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son. No one who denies the...