Can the nonelect ever be born-again? (2 Kings 22:27) With the elect thou wilt be elect: and with the perverse thou wilt be perverted.

By their fruits.

What makes you think they would know if they are one of the elect?

I'm not the one adding to Gods Word. You added your word against what God said. God warned about the horrific consequences for those who do this.

1 Timothy 2:14 Confirms my point that Satan didn't deceive Adam and only Eve was deceived by Satan. As the text clearly says the woman was deceived. Why didn't the text say what you're imposing on it. According to you it should say "but the man and women were deceived" Can you even see how ridiculous your argument is.

The text says no such thing. Repeating your words back to you:

So please stop adding your word to Gods Word, to support your false narrative. Let God speak for Himself, He doesn't need your help

Show me one post I said Adam was Deceived?
I counted how many posts where YOU said Adam was deceived or Satan caused Adam to sin or Eve seduced him.

Since you clearly have problems "TELLING the TRUTH," that is 5 times YOU said Adam was deceived or seduced or Satan caused Adam to SIN.

And there is ZERO times that I said Adam was deceived because I go by the BIBLE unlike YOU!

Well the Bible doesn't say anything like that, you should read Genesis 3 carefully and you will find that Adam told God in verse 12 that the woman gave him the forbidden fruit to eat. There is no mention of Satan at all, so why would Adam blame Eve, if it was Satan.

He clearly blames Eve for being deceived, then when God asked Eve why she did it, she blamed the Serpent for deceiving her. We can't just assume that Adam blamed Eve to protect Satan, that is unthinkable and un biblical.

This is why god warned us not to add or take away from His perfect Word.

My Bible tells me that the Lord Jesus Christ never sinned, so I'm not sure how you came to conclude that He sinned like Adam. He took on the sins of you and me, the sin you speak about must have been yours and mine and not that of the Lord

He clearly says no such thing about being deceived. He simply ate what Eve offered him.

Or are you saying Adam said he knew Eve was deceived? He doesn't say that either. Eve does.

I am a bit late to this whole convo, but clearly you are promoting a narrative not present in the text.

You have the right to express your private opinion but it's obviously born out of unbiblical false doctrines and views. So I reject your opinion in it's entirety. Your opinions and views are never backed by any biblical truths, they are always your private views which are worthless without some kind of Biblical foundation.

My suggestion to you would be to seek out someone to teach you about the Bible, as it is evident to me that you don't know the basics.

So you actually agree with my point that there would be no blood of Jesus without having someone to die for. And they can be none other than the elect of God, whom He foreknew and chose before He created the world.

Thank you

1 John 2:1-2

You are late to this, you need to start by studying Genesis 3 then come back and enlighten us with your findings

I am not late to reading the text. If you misunderstood my plain English I can understand why you mangle the Scripture texts so badly.

Still, it is clear you read much into what is said and add things that are
not there and then pretend that is what is being taught, when it is not.

More to the point: Adam was not deceived, and that is PLAINLY stated in Scripture.

You plainly state the opposite. Over and over, again and again.

We are not buying your version of events.

You failed to connect the dots. I said Adam was deceived by proxy. He used Eve to do His dirty work because He knew that Adam could not be deceived by Him. How can you misrepresent what I said so clearly, I can only conclude that your too proud to admit you were wrong.
Have a nice day

Get familiar with a verse you clearly do not know.

8 ....... and all liars, shall have their part in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.

Adam was not deceived. The text plainly states this. Why do you say the opposite?

I will repeat your words back to you again:

you need to start by studying Genesis 3 then come back and enlighten us with your findings

My advice to you would e to find a study buddy and go back over Gen 3 as it quite obvious your view doesn't line up with what the text plainly says.

The text plainly says Adam was not deceived. You promote the opposite of what the text says.

you need to start by studying Genesis 3 then come back and enlighten us with your findings

OK, so now your saying that Adam didn't sin. But God said he did, you really put me in a tight spot trying to choose whether to put my faith in you or God

But you are lying to so misrepresent what I said, since I said nothing about
Adam sinning, only that he was not deceived. It is plain you seek to deceive also.

Believe what the text says and stop lying about it. Adam was not deceived.

Saying what the text says (Adam was not deceived) is not saying Adam did not sin.

That's just another one of your lies.

OK, so according to your interpretation. Adam wasn't deceived by the Serpent/Satan. And He wasn't deceived by Eve. So instead, he used his God given wisdom and decided to commit suicide.
That doesn't sound like something a wise man of God would do. So your theory doesn't make any sense to me. So I have no choice other than to reject your theory because it doesn't add up. Nor can it be supported by any scripture