Anti-vaxxers are people too?

I don’t think so and that’s contrary to reality and evidence in the modern western civilization.
‘But I’d suggest that you should should take a trip to North Korea or Afghanistan and if you make it back alive you will be kissing the American soil when you land at the airport.

Try to appreciate things a little.

I don’t think so and that’s contrary to reality and evidence in the modern western civilization.
‘But I’d suggest that you should should take a trip to North Korea or Afghanistan and if you make it back alive you will be kissing the American soil when you land at the airport.

Try to appreciate things a little.

can you link the study?

The recent covid-19 scamdemic brought this belief into sharp focus for many likeminded people, but I noticed one strange thing very often when someone was speaking against the covid-19 "vaccines". Right at the start, he or she would begin with the disclaimer "I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but..." As if being an anti-vaxxer somehow gave one less credibility, or meant that one shouldn't have the same right to an opinion as other people, or something.

Here's the study

https://christianchat.com/natural-h...ine-wipes-out-antibodies.207396/#post-4919928

This is a good topic to bring up to those in a forum such as this. I just want to add to the base of information here for those who respond. It in no way casts shade on you Moses nor is intended to change the outcome of the survey. You are likely aware of it as I think you're better informed than the vast majority of TV viewers.

The term"anti-vaxxers" is a pejorative used to insult those who choose not to put their faith in the medical industrial complex. It has been a very effective technique used to demonize us to the general public who has little to no inclination to examine the evidence or history of the concoctions that have had more money spent pushing their drugs than any that I am aware of.
The C👁️A has used this technique as well to frame the natives they use to manipulate the populations of the world. The popular example is the term "conspiracy theory.". If you do not agree with the propaganda they send to the media, they label you as a"conspiracy theorist.". Not only do they send out press releases, but they also fill positions in major news outlets. See my thread on CNN RIP Brian Stelter in the "Conspiracy" forum. There are network anchors and behind the scenes employees of the corporation AND C👁️A. The drug companies work likewise as employers of the FDA and other agencies that cooperate with their profits.

I think most people say that hoping that it will deflect the flak they know they will likely receive if they don't say it.

Thank you for posting this - now I don't have to...

I agree with Eli1, you had a choice. You could retire, resign and move. NYC was probably the most extreme location in the US for mandates but there were other states that offered real freedom, it was easy to move from NYC to these locations since a crummy house in NY sells for what a really nice house in one of these states sells for. Plenty of jobs. Enough with the Humpty Dumpty Christians. Take up your cross and follow the Lord. I am very happy I did that.

Thank you for posting this - now I don't have to...

That's great!

The reason I said that is - from the moment I read the first sentence of the OP, I was thinking that an explanation about the intentional derogatory use of the word 'antivaxxer' was definitely in order...

Oh, oh, I know this one! Because Pfizer contributed to your campaign.

Unintentional....true.
He didn't mean it in a derogatory way as we are on the same page of course. It is a term originally used to bring pressure against those who refrain.

I was strictly talking about those who "invented" the [use of the] word - not @Moses_Young - i.e. - the word was "invented" to be intentionally derogatory.

I was strictly talking about those who "invented" the [use of the] word - not @Moses_Young - i.e. - the word was "invented" to be intentionally derogatory.

As most of you would know by now, I'm a proud anti-vaxxer. That is to say, I'm not against injectable prophylactics per se, but I've never come across one where I've thought the benefits are worth the risks. And I don't expect I ever shall.

The recent covid-19 scamdemic brought this belief into sharp focus for many likeminded people, but I noticed one strange thing very often when someone was speaking against the covid-19 "vaccines". Right at the start, he or she would begin with the disclaimer "I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but..." As if being an anti-vaxxer somehow gave one less credibility, or meant that one shouldn't have the same right to an opinion as other people, or something.

I noted when the government, the Lame Stream Media or the other pharmaceutical stooges pushing the covid-19 vaxxes were trying to sell their snake-oil, they didn't lead with the statement "I'm not on the payroll of Big Pharma, but..."

So what gives? Anti-vaxxers are people, too? Right?

Interesting. Then the CIA did a poorer job on the term "anti-vaxxer" than they did on the term "conspiracy-theorist". Although, these last 2 years, even the phrase "conspiracy-theorist" is something of a compliment. Conspiracy-theorist - someone who keeps getting his narrative proven true.

I actually didn't know that about "anti-vaxxer". Perhaps because I only became an anti-vaxxer some 12 years ago. Coincidentally (or not!) I also became something of a conspiracy-theorist about 12 years ago. (But I don't introduce myself as a conspiracy-theorist!)

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE!

YEP --- there is no doubt in my mind that the word 'natural' is THE most abused word in the English language today...

What about Circle back?

What about New Normal?